Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v0v3g9$2qov3$15@i2pn2.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally?
Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 00:06:33 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <v0v3g9$2qov3$15@i2pn2.org>
References: <v0k4jc$laej$1@dont-email.me> <v0l11u$ussl$1@dont-email.me>
 <v0lh24$123q3$1@dont-email.me> <v0lic7$2g492$3@i2pn2.org>
 <v0lkas$12q0o$3@dont-email.me> <v0loq2$2g493$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v0lq7d$14579$2@dont-email.me> <v0ls98$2g492$7@i2pn2.org>
 <v0m29q$166o1$1@dont-email.me> <v0m37e$2gl1e$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v0m3v5$16k3h$1@dont-email.me> <v0m55t$2gl1f$3@i2pn2.org>
 <v0m5sn$172p4$1@dont-email.me> <v0m7em$2gl1f$5@i2pn2.org>
 <v0m7tq$17dpv$1@dont-email.me> <v0m8g9$2gl1e$6@i2pn2.org>
 <v0m978$17k7o$3@dont-email.me> <v0mko6$2hf3s$2@i2pn2.org>
 <v0n59h$1h98e$1@dont-email.me> <v0o037$2j1tu$3@i2pn2.org>
 <v0oc65$1q3aq$3@dont-email.me> <v0p9ts$2ki5r$6@i2pn2.org>
 <v0q1rk$2a3u1$1@dont-email.me> <v0qkti$2m1nf$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v0r4a3$2hb7o$6@dont-email.me> <v0rsbr$2m1nf$6@i2pn2.org>
 <v0segm$2v4oq$1@dont-email.me> <v0t8o9$2p3ri$2@i2pn2.org>
 <v0tpjf$3881i$5@dont-email.me> <v0ulma$2qov4$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v0uvj5$3kdu6$1@dont-email.me> <v0v2i3$2qov3$7@i2pn2.org>
 <v0v390$3l29l$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 04:06:33 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2974691"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v0v390$3l29l$3@dont-email.me>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2625
Lines: 29

On 5/2/24 12:02 AM, olcott wrote:

> 
> If you do not address it immediately right where I
> post it then I ignore everything after that.
> 
> *We are still on this point*
> (a) It is a verified fact that D(D) simulated by H cannot
> possibly reach past line 03 of D(D) simulated by H whether H
> aborts its simulation or not.
> 
> 

You don't get to set the rules.

Your claim has been refuted.

You have not answered the refuation.

Thus, you claim still stands as REFUTED.

Repeating it is just repeating a known error.

YOU are the one making claims of something new.

YOU have the burden of proof, and must defend against challenges.

FAILURE TO REFUTE is an admission that you don't have an answer.

YOU HAVE ADMITTED TO HAVE FAILED.