Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Threads across programming languages
Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 07:53:21 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <v0v9oh$3mcpv$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
References: <GIL-20240429161553@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
 <v0ogum$1rc5n$1@dont-email.me> <v0ovvl$1ur12$4@dont-email.me>
 <v0p06i$1uq6q$5@dont-email.me>
 <v0shti$2vrco$2@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <v0spsh$31ds4$3@dont-email.me>
 <v0stic$325kv$3@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <v0svtn$32o8h$1@dont-email.me>
 <v0t091$32qj6$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <v0u90h$3c1r5$4@dont-email.me> <v0v7rf$3lu04$1@dont-email.me>
 <v0v8u3$3m7rm$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 02 May 2024 07:53:21 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org; posting-host="fc01b5cced46b9bd2db0b176923fffe4";
	logging-data="3879743"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/FX91oamtYdE+QUxfTim9pVxAFDtjX/eg="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:6zOxSiMT2rrMlQq3I1gDLTx+th0=
Content-Language: de-DE
In-Reply-To: <v0v8u3$3m7rm$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2033

Am 02.05.2024 um 07:39 schrieb Lawrence D'Oliveiro:

> Another reason to avoid threads. So long as your async tasks have an await
> call somewhere in their main loops, that should be sufficient to avoid
> most bottlenecks.

If you have a stream of individual I/Os and the processing of the I/Os
takes more time than the time between the I/Os you need threads. And
usually the processing takes longer.
You constantly deny technologies which overburden you.