Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <v14agq$10e58$4@dont-email.me>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v14agq$10e58$4@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.nobody.at!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Threads across programming languages
Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 20:36:58 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <v14agq$10e58$4@dont-email.me>
References: <GIL-20240429161553@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
 <v0ogum$1rc5n$1@dont-email.me> <v0ovvl$1ur12$4@dont-email.me>
 <v0p06i$1uq6q$5@dont-email.me>
 <v0shti$2vrco$2@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <v0spsh$31ds4$3@dont-email.me>
 <v0stic$325kv$3@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <v0svtn$32o8h$1@dont-email.me>
 <v0t091$32qj6$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <v0u90h$3c1r5$4@dont-email.me> <v0v7rf$3lu04$1@dont-email.me>
 <v0v8u3$3m7rm$1@dont-email.me>
 <v0v9oh$3mcpv$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <v116s6$4at1$2@dont-email.me>
 <v1222d$db4v$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <v146kd$vrsv$7@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 04 May 2024 05:36:59 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="00566bb81b0a3452542610785f934900";
	logging-data="1063080"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/38535k6QYpxjq3kSyaFJGTA/IY0ha0YM="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:w2RCqI3pDkV4QN6OX8MeRARNfh0=
In-Reply-To: <v146kd$vrsv$7@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2648

On 5/3/2024 7:30 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
> On Fri, 3 May 2024 09:00:30 +0200, Bonita Montero wrote:
> 
>> Am 03.05.2024 um 01:16 schrieb Lawrence D'Oliveiro:
>>
>>> On Thu, 2 May 2024 07:53:21 +0200, Bonita Montero wrote:
>>>
>>>> If you have a stream of individual I/Os and the processing of the I/Os
>>>> takes more time than the time between the I/Os you need threads.
>>>
>>> That makes the CPU the bottleneck. Which is not the case we’re
>>> discussing here.
>>
>> No, the processing beetween the I/O can mostly depend on other I/Os,
>> which is the standard case for server applications.
> 
> In that situation, multithreading isn’t going to speed things up.

ummm, so what does the server do after getting an io completion...?

It has to do something. Look something up in a RCU protected database 
structure, ect, ect... Thread sync scalability usually becomes an issue 
right when your server experiences any type of decent load. Especially 
heavy load! ;^o