Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v14uvf$14slk$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? Date: Sat, 4 May 2024 12:26:07 +0300 Organization: - Lines: 45 Message-ID: <v14uvf$14slk$1@dont-email.me> References: <v0k4jc$laej$1@dont-email.me> <v0lic7$2g492$3@i2pn2.org> <v0lkas$12q0o$3@dont-email.me> <v0loq2$2g493$1@i2pn2.org> <v0lq7d$14579$2@dont-email.me> <v0ls98$2g492$7@i2pn2.org> <v0m29q$166o1$1@dont-email.me> <v0m37e$2gl1e$1@i2pn2.org> <v0m3v5$16k3h$1@dont-email.me> <v0m55t$2gl1f$3@i2pn2.org> <v0m5sn$172p4$1@dont-email.me> <v0oban$1o3b$1@news.muc.de> <v0oce3$1q3aq$4@dont-email.me> <v0oe1b$1o3b$2@news.muc.de> <v0ofl3$1r1mf$1@dont-email.me> <v0oh7g$1o3b$3@news.muc.de> <v0olhv$1sgeo$1@dont-email.me> <v0oobd$1o3b$4@news.muc.de> <v0or07$1tmga$1@dont-email.me> <v0qb59$2bsfc$1@dont-email.me> <v0r242$2hb7o$1@dont-email.me> <v0r3kh$hka$1@news.muc.de> <v0r5f2$2hb7o$11@dont-email.me> <v0r78v$hka$3@news.muc.de> <v0rd16$2k1bi$1@dont-email.me> <v0t3uj$1iuj$2@news.muc.de> <v0tneg$37lgj$5@dont-email.me> <v0umsa$2qov3$3@i2pn2.org> <v0v0tm$3kdu6$5@dont-email.me> <v0vlmb$3ovek$1@dont-email.me> <v1098d$3tep8$2@dont-email.me> <v12a35$f4kk$1@dont-email.me> <v12if4$h1tj$2@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 04 May 2024 11:26:08 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5d1ad03f625c1be42bfcdb251a7e703b"; logging-data="1209012"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+EQIEwLmynS7DqM0J69ppP" User-Agent: Unison/2.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:b6VoCtrCtz0DXPVlcSbKzuElsNQ= Bytes: 3368 On 2024-05-03 11:40:20 +0000, olcott said: > On 5/3/2024 4:17 AM, Mikko wrote: >> On 2024-05-02 14:50:53 +0000, olcott said: >> >>> On 5/2/2024 4:16 AM, Mikko wrote: >>>> On 2024-05-02 03:22:29 +0000, olcott said: >>>> >>>>> When I had to make changes to Bank's the VISA credit card system >>>>> I had to re-read the VISA change document fifteen times before >>>>> I was confident that I understood every relevant detail. >>>> >>>> It's only because there was no detail that you could not accept. >>>> Had there been one you could have stopped reading as soon you >>>> found it, perhaps even before reading first time to the end. >>>> >>> >>> It was because 99% of the details did not apply to my system >>> that I had to carefully study all of the details to see which >>> ones applied. >>> >>>> Likewise with your proofs: as soon as one error is found there >>>> is no need to read further in order to determine that the proof >>>> is erroneous. >>>> >>> >>> There is no error in this and it is a verified fact not requiring >>> any subjective judgement call: >>> >>> (a) It is a verified fact that D(D) simulated by H cannot >>> possibly reach past line 03 of D(D) simulated by H whether H >>> aborts its simulation or not. >> >> The use of an ambigouos expression "D(D) simulated by H" can >> be regarded as an error. >> > > Perhaps you C skills are not that great? As "D(D) simulated by H" is not strictly conforming C and is not presented as such, my C skills are not relevant. -- Mikko