Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <v1549m$2783$1@news.muc.de>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v1549m$2783$1@news.muc.de>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.karotte.org!news.space.net!news.muc.de!.POSTED.news.muc.de!not-for-mail
From: Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: D simulated by H never halts no matter what H does V3
Followup-To: comp.theory
Date: Sat, 4 May 2024 10:56:54 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: muc.de e.V.
Message-ID: <v1549m$2783$1@news.muc.de>
References: <uvq0sg$21m7a$1@dont-email.me>   <v0jdul$g54u$2@dont-email.me> <v0li2c$12aq4$3@dont-email.me> <v0oanj$1pbn5$5@dont-email.me> <v0odkk$1qhdh$1@dont-email.me> <v0of13$1qs9n$1@dont-email.me> <v0qbg8$2c7pe$1@dont-email.me> <v0r350$2hb7o$3@dont-email.me> <v0t2rj$33d7g$1@dont-email.me> <v0to22$3881i$1@dont-email.me> <v0vnud$3pgsv$1@dont-email.me> <v107il$3t543$1@dont-email.me> <v128nt$erc9$1@dont-email.me> <v12ic3$h1tj$1@dont-email.me> <v13mk5$30j8v$1@i2pn2.org> <v149ir$10h7m$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Sat, 4 May 2024 10:56:54 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: news.muc.de; posting-host="news.muc.de:2001:608:1000::2";
	logging-data="72963"; mail-complaints-to="news-admin@muc.de"
User-Agent: tin/2.6.3-20231224 ("Banff") (FreeBSD/14.0-RELEASE-p5 (amd64))
Bytes: 2802
Lines: 42

[ Followup-To: set ]

In comp.theory olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5/3/2024 4:57 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 5/3/24 7:38 AM, olcott wrote:

[ .... ]

>>> (a) It is a verified fact that D(D) simulated by H cannot
>>> possibly reach past line 03 of D(D) simulated by H whether
>>> H aborts its simulation or not.

>> Proven incorrect and you have decline to try to refute it, thus 
>> conceding it to be incorrect, and your restatement just a lie.

> "proven to be incorrect" by nonsense gibberish
> That "D simulated by H" can mean "D NEVER simulated by H"

> Also you fail to understand that when the executed H(D,D)
> aborts its simulated input that all of the nested simulations
> (if any) immediately totally stop running. No simulated H ever
> returns any value to any simulated D.

> That is only ordinary software engineering with zero subjective
> leeway of interpretation. It is just like I yank the power cord
> from the wall and you don't understand that the program immediately
> stops running.

> You are doing better than Alan on this though he doesn't
> have a single clue about what execution traces are or how
> they work.

You should read "How to make friends and influence people" by Dale
Carnegie.  You may not care about the former, but you sure are trying the
latter.  Hint: telling nasty lies about people is not effective.

> -- 
> Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
> hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

-- 
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).