Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v156sp$16e3t$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to
 passing
Date: Sat, 4 May 2024 13:43:09 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <v156sp$16e3t$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v0v81o$96oj$1@solani.org>
 <jr0a3jlr5tsjch2u58raqbd4jd2d69cdck@4ax.com>
 <49fhgkxdv5.ln2@Telcontar.valinor>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 04 May 2024 13:41:14 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f050da8d7fc0bee3db548d7bcbd2e003";
	logging-data="1259645"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/ikcCkTi4ym2x37oIGnbWL"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.13.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:qq6XM6DhnbXsNfNSZoe+CbCatWY=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <49fhgkxdv5.ln2@Telcontar.valinor>
Bytes: 2284

On 5/4/24 12:29, Carlos E.R. wrote:
> On 2024-05-03 17:43, John Larkin wrote:
>> On Thu, 02 May 2024 05:24:08 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> AM radio law opposed by tech and auto industries is close to passing
>>> https://arstechnica.com/cars/2024/05/am-radio-is-a-lifeline-lawmakers-say-tech-and-auto-industries-disagree/
>>> A recent test of the emergency alert system found only 1 percent got 
>>> it via AM.
>>>
>>> Strange. most is FM these days, or digital?
>>> Something to do with Soros buying radio stations ;-) ?
>>
>> AM radio is a century-old technology. It makes more sense to push
>> microwatts of light over a fiber, or a few watts from a gen6 cell
>> node, than to spray tens or hundreds of kilowatts of RF out into the
>> universe.
> 
> Heh. The power needed is not that related to being old technology, but 
> to the frequency used. The lower the frequency, the more power is needed.
> 
[...]

I'm pretty sure that the power consumed by modern telecoms
infrastructure exceeds that of broadcast radio manyfold.

Jeroen Belleman