Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v15fc9$17unh$6@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.nobody.at!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: D simulated by H never halts no matter what H does V3
Date: Sat, 4 May 2024 09:06:01 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 58
Message-ID: <v15fc9$17unh$6@dont-email.me>
References: <uvq0sg$21m7a$1@dont-email.me> <v0jdul$g54u$2@dont-email.me>
 <v0li2c$12aq4$3@dont-email.me> <v0oanj$1pbn5$5@dont-email.me>
 <v0odkk$1qhdh$1@dont-email.me> <v0of13$1qs9n$1@dont-email.me>
 <v0qbg8$2c7pe$1@dont-email.me> <v0r350$2hb7o$3@dont-email.me>
 <v0t2rj$33d7g$1@dont-email.me> <v0to22$3881i$1@dont-email.me>
 <v0vnud$3pgsv$1@dont-email.me> <v107il$3t543$1@dont-email.me>
 <v128nt$erc9$1@dont-email.me> <v12ic3$h1tj$1@dont-email.me>
 <v13mk5$30j8v$1@i2pn2.org> <v149ir$10h7m$1@dont-email.me>
 <v1549m$2783$1@news.muc.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 04 May 2024 16:06:01 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2d5b94937ab75d91202558453b5391e6";
	logging-data="1309425"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/GPEIPTZnIZQl/vdwBXwJ0"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:3tDx9iscH2qLAF+A8zs0jo1kLuU=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v1549m$2783$1@news.muc.de>
Bytes: 3696

On 5/4/2024 5:56 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> [ Followup-To: set ]
> 
> In comp.theory olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 5/3/2024 4:57 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 5/3/24 7:38 AM, olcott wrote:
> 
> [ .... ]
> 
>>>> (a) It is a verified fact that D(D) simulated by H cannot
>>>> possibly reach past line 03 of D(D) simulated by H whether
>>>> H aborts its simulation or not.
> 
>>> Proven incorrect and you have decline to try to refute it, thus
>>> conceding it to be incorrect, and your restatement just a lie.
> 
>> "proven to be incorrect" by nonsense gibberish
>> That "D simulated by H" can mean "D NEVER simulated by H"
> 
>> Also you fail to understand that when the executed H(D,D)
>> aborts its simulated input that all of the nested simulations
>> (if any) immediately totally stop running. No simulated H ever
>> returns any value to any simulated D.
> 
>> That is only ordinary software engineering with zero subjective
>> leeway of interpretation. It is just like I yank the power cord
>> from the wall and you don't understand that the program immediately
>> stops running.
> 
>> You are doing better than Alan on this though he doesn't
>> have a single clue about what execution traces are or how
>> they work.
> 
> You should read "How to make friends and influence people" by Dale
> Carnegie.  You may not care about the former, but you sure are trying the
> latter.  Hint: telling nasty lies about people is not effective.
> 

The alternative of disparaging my work without even looking at
it is far worse because it meets the

https://dictionary.findlaw.com/definition/reckless-disregard-of-the-truth.html

required for libel and defamation cases.

I prefer honest dialogues. Whenever the other party diverges from this
I will call it out. It may be fun to have an insult party until this
makes one look ridiculously foolish.

>> -- 
>> Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
>> hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
> 

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer