Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v15fc9$17unh$6@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.nobody.at!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: D simulated by H never halts no matter what H does V3 Date: Sat, 4 May 2024 09:06:01 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 58 Message-ID: <v15fc9$17unh$6@dont-email.me> References: <uvq0sg$21m7a$1@dont-email.me> <v0jdul$g54u$2@dont-email.me> <v0li2c$12aq4$3@dont-email.me> <v0oanj$1pbn5$5@dont-email.me> <v0odkk$1qhdh$1@dont-email.me> <v0of13$1qs9n$1@dont-email.me> <v0qbg8$2c7pe$1@dont-email.me> <v0r350$2hb7o$3@dont-email.me> <v0t2rj$33d7g$1@dont-email.me> <v0to22$3881i$1@dont-email.me> <v0vnud$3pgsv$1@dont-email.me> <v107il$3t543$1@dont-email.me> <v128nt$erc9$1@dont-email.me> <v12ic3$h1tj$1@dont-email.me> <v13mk5$30j8v$1@i2pn2.org> <v149ir$10h7m$1@dont-email.me> <v1549m$2783$1@news.muc.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 04 May 2024 16:06:01 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2d5b94937ab75d91202558453b5391e6"; logging-data="1309425"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/GPEIPTZnIZQl/vdwBXwJ0" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:3tDx9iscH2qLAF+A8zs0jo1kLuU= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <v1549m$2783$1@news.muc.de> Bytes: 3696 On 5/4/2024 5:56 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > [ Followup-To: set ] > > In comp.theory olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 5/3/2024 4:57 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>> On 5/3/24 7:38 AM, olcott wrote: > > [ .... ] > >>>> (a) It is a verified fact that D(D) simulated by H cannot >>>> possibly reach past line 03 of D(D) simulated by H whether >>>> H aborts its simulation or not. > >>> Proven incorrect and you have decline to try to refute it, thus >>> conceding it to be incorrect, and your restatement just a lie. > >> "proven to be incorrect" by nonsense gibberish >> That "D simulated by H" can mean "D NEVER simulated by H" > >> Also you fail to understand that when the executed H(D,D) >> aborts its simulated input that all of the nested simulations >> (if any) immediately totally stop running. No simulated H ever >> returns any value to any simulated D. > >> That is only ordinary software engineering with zero subjective >> leeway of interpretation. It is just like I yank the power cord >> from the wall and you don't understand that the program immediately >> stops running. > >> You are doing better than Alan on this though he doesn't >> have a single clue about what execution traces are or how >> they work. > > You should read "How to make friends and influence people" by Dale > Carnegie. You may not care about the former, but you sure are trying the > latter. Hint: telling nasty lies about people is not effective. > The alternative of disparaging my work without even looking at it is far worse because it meets the https://dictionary.findlaw.com/definition/reckless-disregard-of-the-truth.html required for libel and defamation cases. I prefer honest dialogues. Whenever the other party diverges from this I will call it out. It may be fun to have an insult party until this makes one look ridiculously foolish. >> -- >> Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius >> hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer > -- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer