Path: ...!news.nobody.at!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.szaf.org!news.karotte.org!news.space.net!news.muc.de!.POSTED.news.muc.de!not-for-mail
From: Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: D simulated by H never halts no matter what H does V3
Date: Sat, 4 May 2024 14:39:25 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: muc.de e.V.
Message-ID: <v15hat$94v$1@news.muc.de>
References: <uvq0sg$21m7a$1@dont-email.me>   <v0oanj$1pbn5$5@dont-email.me> <v0odkk$1qhdh$1@dont-email.me> <v0of13$1qs9n$1@dont-email.me> <v0qbg8$2c7pe$1@dont-email.me> <v0r350$2hb7o$3@dont-email.me> <v0t2rj$33d7g$1@dont-email.me> <v0to22$3881i$1@dont-email.me> <v0vnud$3pgsv$1@dont-email.me> <v107il$3t543$1@dont-email.me> <v128nt$erc9$1@dont-email.me> <v12ic3$h1tj$1@dont-email.me> <v13mk5$30j8v$1@i2pn2.org> <v149ir$10h7m$1@dont-email.me> <v1549m$2783$1@news.muc.de> <v15fc9$17unh$6@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Sat, 4 May 2024 14:39:25 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: news.muc.de; posting-host="news.muc.de:2001:608:1000::2";
	logging-data="9375"; mail-complaints-to="news-admin@muc.de"
User-Agent: tin/2.6.3-20231224 ("Banff") (FreeBSD/14.0-RELEASE-p5 (amd64))
Bytes: 3046
Lines: 48

olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5/4/2024 5:56 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>> [ Followup-To: set ]

>> In comp.theory olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:

[ .... ]

>>> You are doing better than Alan on this though he doesn't
>>> have a single clue about what execution traces are or how
>>> they work.

>> You should read "How to make friends and influence people" by Dale
>> Carnegie.  You may not care about the former, but you sure are trying
>> the latter.  Hint: telling nasty lies about people is not effective.


> The alternative of disparaging my work without even looking at
> it is far worse because it meets the

> https://dictionary.findlaw.com/definition/reckless-disregard-of-the-truth.html

> required for libel and defamation cases.

No.  There have got to be limits on what one spends ones time on.  You
have been maintaining false things over the years to such a degree that
it would be a waste of time suddenly to expect brilliant insights from
you.  For example, you insist that robustly proven mathematical theorems
are false, and your "reasoning" hardly merits the word.

> I prefer honest dialogues. Whenever the other party diverges from this
> I will call it out. It may be fun to have an insult party until this
> makes one look ridiculously foolish.

You do NOT prefer honest dialogues at all.  You are not prepared, ever,
to admit where you are wrong.  You seem to insist that everybody else
takes your pronouncements at face value.  You do not appear to try to
understand others' points of view, even (especially?) where they are
right.

How is that "honest dialogue"?

> -- 
> Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
> hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

-- 
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).