Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v15r44$1akk9$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?RTD=20tells=20us=20how=20he=E2=80=99s=20going?= =?UTF-8?Q?=20to=20just=20move=20forward?= Date: Sat, 4 May 2024 17:26:28 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 25 Message-ID: <v15r44$1akk9$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 04 May 2024 19:26:29 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="bbc490e887ec82331730198cb4ebf9ba"; logging-data="1397385"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/pML62nSy79vBXhPvfMjne" User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch) Cancel-Lock: sha1:+cGWkkeo8QxEsQ55etw/UqVYw8I= sha1:IIAN2NgCIcCCK8gVRbx4UAeSYOk= Bytes: 2282 At the premiere cinema showing of the opening of the new season, RTD had this to say: "I think The Timeless Child doesn’t mean anything to anyone, to a lot of viewers. Genuinely, to a few outside the show – what does that mean? But what it does mean is the Doctor’s an orphan, he was abandoned, he was adopted by the Time Lords, so you play that for the emotions. "I don't want to hang things off science fiction words, that simply won't mean anything around the breakfast table. But, if you're talking about a family with a world in which people adopt children, or foster children, or abandoned children, then suddenly it begins to register with you. So that's our take on that. "And that's going to have a lot of ammunition and fuel going forward. Because it goes Millie as Ruby Sunday, she was abandoned as a family on the church doorstep. So you have the Doctor and companion suddenly chiming with their lives connecting." So - no retcon. RTD is basically going to ignore the Timeless Child per se, but play on the idea of the Doctor being originally a foundling adopted by the Time Lords. So it’s still there - but just as background motivation. I can live with that. -- “The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor