Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: D simulated by H never halts no matter what H does V3 ---
Date: Sun, 5 May 2024 13:54:20 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <v18h4c$5asr$6@i2pn2.org>
References: <uvq0sg$21m7a$1@dont-email.me> <v107il$3t543$1@dont-email.me>
 <v128nt$erc9$1@dont-email.me> <v12ic3$h1tj$1@dont-email.me>
 <v13mk5$30j8v$1@i2pn2.org> <v149ir$10h7m$1@dont-email.me>
 <v1549m$2783$1@news.muc.de> <v15fc9$17unh$6@dont-email.me>
 <v15hat$94v$1@news.muc.de> <v15hsc$17unh$8@dont-email.me>
 <v15lk0$1qp4$2@i2pn2.org> <v15nta$19ip0$1@dont-email.me>
 <v15qg3$1qp4$6@i2pn2.org> <v15vqo$1bfmh$1@dont-email.me>
 <v166fj$2oq7$1@i2pn2.org> <v168mo$1df60$1@dont-email.me>
 <v16a6g$2oq7$2@i2pn2.org> <v16blg$1e52t$1@dont-email.me>
 <v16d93$2oq8$1@i2pn2.org> <v16eon$1eq05$1@dont-email.me>
 <v16gir$2oq8$2@i2pn2.org> <v16hln$1f7fm$1@dont-email.me>
 <v16ikg$2oq7$3@i2pn2.org> <v16jd1$1fk82$1@dont-email.me>
 <v16kou$2oq8$3@i2pn2.org> <v16l3c$1ftgf$1@dont-email.me>
 <v16m1a$2oq8$4@i2pn2.org> <v16nfc$1gasi$1@dont-email.me>
 <v16s30$2oq7$4@i2pn2.org> <v16tp4$1l8ug$1@dont-email.me>
 <v17ng9$1qb0a$2@dont-email.me> <v1855s$1t4hn$3@dont-email.me>
 <v18crf$5asr$1@i2pn2.org> <v18f6o$1vhpv$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 5 May 2024 17:54:20 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="175003"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
In-Reply-To: <v18f6o$1vhpv$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3186
Lines: 34

On 5/5/24 1:21 PM, olcott wrote:
> On 5/5/2024 11:41 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 5/5/24 10:30 AM, olcott wrote:
>>> On 5/5/2024 5:36 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>
>>>> Those N steps were simulated correctly, but the fact that it stops 
>>>> after N steps make it an incorrect simulation.
>>>
>>> In other words a decider is wrong unless it never
>>> stops simulating an non-halting input?
>>
>> No, the decider is wrong if it gives the wrong answer.
>>
>> Now, if to determine the correct answer requires simulating more, then 
>> it needs to simulate more.
>>
>> If to determine the correct answer requires simulating to the end, it 
>> needs to simulate to the end, even if that takes forever.
>>
>> If it needs to simulate forever, but also needs to answer in finite 
>> time, then the method has just been shown not to meet the requirements.
>>
> 
> Bullshit. Try and show any detail that it incorrect
> with the conclusion of my new post:
> [Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H]

I did and you ignored it turning you into a LIAR by restating it.

You even elsewhere said you were going to refute it, but never did.

All you are doing is showing that you don't care about truth, but just 
want to push your lies.