Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_RTD_tells_us_how_he=E2=80=99s_going_to_just_move_fo?=
 =?UTF-8?Q?rward?=
Date: Sun, 5 May 2024 21:15:55 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 208
Message-ID: <v18pds$21u7a$2@dont-email.me>
References: <v15r44$1akk9$1@dont-email.me> <v18grd$1vts5$1@dont-email.me>
 <v18kb8$1hkr$9@gallifrey.nk.ca> <v18m3m$2149e$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 05 May 2024 22:15:57 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8c27269d3f4c264674f183247288e482";
	logging-data="2160874"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1875aL6rCrHceeY/XjgFzQjIMKt2YImVjs="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PnGf58n+9T9buUL0Ggqsys8qY6I=
In-Reply-To: <v18m3m$2149e$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-GB
Bytes: 10618

On 05/05/2024 20:19, The Last Doctor wrote:
> The Spammer <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>> In article <v18grd$1vts5$1@dont-email.me>,
>> The Loon<agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>>> On 04/05/2024 18:26, The Last Doctor wrote:
>>>> At the premiere cinema showing of the opening of the new season, RTD had
>>>> this to say:
>>>>
>>>> "I think The Timeless Child doesn’t mean anything to anyone, to a lot of
>>>> viewers. Genuinely, to a few outside the show – what does that mean? But
>>>> what it does mean is the Doctor’s an orphan, he was abandoned, he was
>>>> adopted by the Time Lords, so you play that for the emotions.
>>>
>>> Oh yes, a child from another culture that was abducted, neglected, left
>>> to die, experimented on, repeatedly murdered,
> 
> Yep, there was definitely some pure evil done to that child by Tecteun. Of
> course, we have no idea what anyone other than Tecteun actually knew about
> that.
> 
>>> and turned into an agent
>>> of evil, a mass murdering genocidal maniac.
> 
> This, however, is just lunatic invention from Aggie. There is a narrative
> in the show suggesting that the Doctor worked for a “Black Ops” Division of
> Time Lord security. But no indication that the Doctor did anything
> personally evil and absolutely not one word about the Doctor committing
> even one murder, let alone being a genocidal maniac.
> 

Wrong! The child murdering bitch planned to destroy the entire universe 
and exterminate all life in both that and the other universe she planned 
to concur along with the Timeless Child. It is clearly signposted that 
Timeless Child monster Ruth fled the Division after she grew a 
conscience and realized the immensity of her crimes. There is every 
indication that the Timeless Child monster colluded in murder and 
genocide even it it didn't carry it out itself, just like the Nazi 
concentration camp guards knew that crimes that were being carried out 
there but did nothing. The Timeless Child monster knew full well of the 
crimes of the Division that it willingly assisted by being part of it, 
which is why it fled.

>>>
>>>> "I don't want to hang things off science fiction words, that simply won't
>>>> mean anything around the breakfast table. But, if you're talking about a
>>>> family with a world in which people adopt children, or foster children, or
>>>> abandoned children, then suddenly it begins to register with you. So that's
>>>> our take on that.
>>>> "And that's going to have a lot of ammunition and fuel going forward.
>>>> Because it goes Millie as Ruby Sunday, she was abandoned as a family on the
>>>> church doorstep. So you have the Doctor and companion suddenly chiming with
>>>> their lives connecting."
>>>
>>> I don't give a fuck about her or the child grooming pervert.
> 
> Aggie is on some serious insane kick. Who is this “child grooming pervert”
> he’s going on about? What evidence does he have that whoever this is, is a
> “child grooming pervert”? Apart from those voices in his head?
> 

We have every indiction from his manner of dress and behaviour that 
Gatwa is a child grooming pervert. What other kind of person would 
appear in a show called 'Sex Education'? Who does he think he is going 
to attract by dressing provocatively like a woman, because it isn't 
heterosexual adults. The only people this manner of dress could attract, 
appeal to or entice is children. Even gay men wouldn't find it 
attractive because gay men don't fancy women at all.

>>> There's
>>> nothing for the majority of people to identify with or aspire two in
>>> either of those characters.
> 
> Nothing positive about the Doctor? Nothing positive about an adopted child
> who seems to have grown up into a healthy, happy young woman? Aggie doesn’t

Gatwa is an effeminate child grooming pervert. There is nothing positive 
about that in any way.

Why does the audience need to be told Gibson was adopted? All it does is 
exclude everyone who isn't from using her as a role model, because 
that's all that she stands from. She doesn't have any personal 
attributes defining who she is, it's all about what she is instead. This 
is how retards and bigots think. What you are, what race you are, what 
gender you are, what sexuality you are, not who you are, your 
intelligence, your demonstration of an ability or skill, your strength, 
and how you acquired these attributes and how you use them, why and what 
for.

> seem to have a clue who he thinks he’s talking about, and certainly knows
> nothing about “the majority of people”. He’s barely an expert on lunatic
> racist middle aged incels who live in basement flats in Northampton, and
> there’s no evidence that there’s more than ONE of them, let alone that they
> are representative of “the majority of people”.
> 

You are a totally deranged bigot and a retard.

>>> Ruby should have been an ordinary person,
>>> from an ordinary home, living an ordinary life, like everyone else.
> 
> Why? In any case, this is pretty much what we are told about her, apart
> from the oddity of how she was left and the goblins’ interest in her -
> which is the cause of the Doctor’s interest in her.
> 

All examples of bad writing where the female protagonist does nothing on 
her own merit. She's nothing more than a Mary Sue which is how woke 
retards write all female characters.

>>> Then
>>> her life changes from the ordinary when she meets the Doctor,
> 
> Which is what she does.
> 

She a Mary Sue so nothing changes for her. She's already perfect.

>>> not a
>>> child grooming pervert
> 
> What “child grooming pervert”? This imaginary character Aggie keeps
> bringing up is seriously interfering with his ability to make a genuine
> argument.

Gatwa. See above.

> 
>>> and after undergoing new struggles and through a
>>> heroic journey she learns new lessons and aspires to become someone
>>> better than before.
> 
> Maybe she will. Who knows? We’ve only seen her introductory meet-cute with
> the Doctor.

The child grooming pervert RTD doesn't know how to write a heroic 
journey. He's not even writing for men but for women. Everything that 
attracted men to watch shows like Doctor Who has been removed by woke 
bigots like Chibnall and Davies. He's a degenerate woke soap opera 
writer. He wouldn't know a hero even if one shoved their cock up his 
arse, which of course a real hero would never do. If he does understand 
the principles of good writing he'd understand that the Timeless Child 
totally destroys and annihilates the heroic nature of the Doctor and 
turns him into a monster.

> 
>>> Gibson and Gatwa have shown us nothing about
>>> learning, heroism, and wisdom. It's all nothing more than mind numbing
>>> soap opera, bigoted left-wing lecturing, attempts to sexually groom
>>> children, cartoon logic and magic instead of science, reason, and using
>>> you mind to overcome adversity.
> 
> I see Aggie has already written his “review” of eight episodes he hasn’t
> seen yet (as well as the one he has seen but utterly failed to understand).

They're all going to be absolute crap given Davies's new and existing 
retarded comments.

https://boundingintocomics.com/2024/05/01/doctor-who-showrunner-confirms-upcoming-season-to-feature-heavy-focus-on-progressive-messaging-if-youre-not-writing-that-in-2024-what-on-earth-are-you-doing/

> 
>>>> So - no retcon. RTD is basically going to ignore the Timeless Child per se,
>>>> but play on the idea of the Doctor being originally a foundling adopted by
>>>> the Time Lords. So it’s still there - but just as background motivation.
>>>>
>>>> I can live with that.
>>>
>>> Only if you condone systematic child abuse and murder.
> 
> Being OK with moving on from a story that hasn’t even been told is
> absolutely not the same as condoning the abuse that was done to the
> Timeless Child.

Yes it is. The pervert RTD thinks it's fine to abuse children, murder, 
and experiment on them because that's how the fake Doctor was created 
and that's what he stands for.

> 
========== REMAINDER OF ARTICLE TRUNCATED ==========