Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v1a9l3$2gbp7$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: From the Archives .....
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 19:58:56 +1000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 54
Message-ID: <v1a9l3$2gbp7$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v151ke$15ed1$1@dont-email.me> <v15h0d$18g41$2@dont-email.me>
 <v16bad$4pm$7@gallifrey.nk.ca> <v17if2$1p10u$4@dont-email.me>
 <v17r2e$be2$5@gallifrey.nk.ca> <v184kb$1t50h$2@dont-email.me>
 <v189gd$1u9ev$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 06 May 2024 11:58:59 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0e369fff10421f929db5ee7f05c2b43b";
	logging-data="2633511"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/JPNiyH3X6PO5vZjsjfVC4LRfdP1qWT0k="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:sAfpWlYgq7sUYy82JvoWsxPYwkI=
In-Reply-To: <v189gd$1u9ev$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 3477

The Last Doctor wrote on 6/5/24 1:44 am:
> Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 5/5/24 9:37 pm:
>>> In article <v17if2$1p10u$4@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
>>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 5/5/24 8:02 am:
>>>>> In article <v15h0d$18g41$2@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
>>>>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 4/5/24 11:29 pm:
>>>>>>> In article <v151ke$15ed1$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70 
>>>>>>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Todays posting from the Archives comes from a thread
>>>>>>>> called "Seasons 5 & 6: Comments" from back in July 1991
>>>>>>>> ....
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Quote At that point in the series, regeneration (it
>>>>>>>> hadn't even been called that) was only done by the
>>>>>>>> Doctor; it was something he built into the TARDIS
>>>>>>>> (since at that point, the TARDIS was something he
>>>>>>>> made). End Quote
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> O.K. so for a long time it seemed that The Doctor could
>>>>>>>> only regenerate whilst with-in The TARDIS, but,
>>>>>>>> originally, was it actually suggested that Regeneration
>>>>>>>> was *ONLY* possible because of what The Doctor had
>>>>>>>> Built into HIS TARDIS Type 40??
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Power of the Daleks.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> What about it, a%e??
>>>>> 
>>>>> It would hold the explanation red-beard!
>>>> 
>>>> .... which is, a%e, ..............??
>>> 
>>> How many regenerations are available.
>>> 
>>> Did you not read MM's explanation?
>> 
>> .... and where is Mike's explanation, IN THIS THREAD, asswipe??
> 
> Right near the beginning. The one to which you replied “OK, ta,
> Mike”. Why Dave is on about it I’ve no idea - particularly as he’s
> now brought in “number of regenerations” which had NOTHING to do with
> the quote and which I certainly didn’t comment on in this thread.
> 
Ah!! Well there you go!!

As I'm posting about a different post "From the Archives .....", I'm not 
quoting any of the previous "From the Archives ....." posts as a prelude 
to this 'twig', so I didn't see any reference to my '“OK, ta, Mike”' 
post .... hence my confusion!! ;-(
-- 
Daniel