Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com>
Newsgroups: news.software.nntp
Subject: Re: Young people peering
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 02:18:57 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 67
Message-ID: <v1c32h$3123j$1@dont-email.me>
References: <uvgh5a$1d8l$10@gallifrey.nk.ca> <v00uqn$325p1$6@dont-email.me> <1qsc0up.13veal619hghjyN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> <v1c0td$2skfl$4@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Tue, 07 May 2024 04:18:57 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f74df4a862178c31e49a9a9aad2d1376";
	logging-data="3180659"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19ojEzrAmKceMetK29tj/Xo6YZXAPYaiXk="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:TPolOTQmCATNd2QK8mlCRcfjshU=
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Bytes: 3449

immibis  <news@immibis.com> wrote:
>On 20/04/24 22:45, Sn!pe wrote:
>> The Bjornsdottirs - Lightning <zerda@umbrellix.net> top-posted:
>> 
>>> Understand that we don't believe we would necessarily fail.
>>>
>>> Instead, the values of this network do not and cannot align with my
>>> values.
>>>
>>> This is why I am demotivated. The technical challenge is surmountable,
>>> almost easy, in my estimation. I recommend everyone give it a go, at least
>>> to start a private, non-Usenet NNTP forum. The social challenge makes me
>>> wonder if I should not instead try to come to command an army and destroy
>>> the entire network, collateral damage be damned.
>>>
>>> When I come across Usenet admins, they cannot clearly say that they will
>>> ban and filter anyone they come across committing harassment, nor that
>>> they will institute a code of conduct which is actively antifascist,
>>> because the values of the network are not actively antifascist and in fact
>>> tend towards calling antifascists whiners.
>> 
>> [...]
>> 
>> You appear to be advocating censorship.  Usenet is a rare bastion of
>> free speech.  All shades of opinion are given equal weight in the court
>> of its readership, including those opinions that some do not like.  This
>> is in the nature of debate.  Valid arguments will win debates, others
>> will fail.
>> 
>
>PINEAPPLE BELONGS ON PIZZA
>PINEAPPLE BELONGS ON PIZZA
>PINEAPPLE BELONGS ON PIZZA
>PINEAPPLE BELONGS ON PIZZA
>PINEAPPLE BELONGS ON PIZZA
>PINEAPPLE BELONGS ON PIZZA
>PINEAPPLE BELONGS ON PIZZA
>PINEAPPLE BELONGS ON PIZZA
>PINEAPPLE BELONGS ON PIZZA
>PINEAPPLE BELONGS ON PIZZA
>PINEAPPLE BELONGS ON PIZZA
>PINEAPPLE BELONGS ON PIZZA
>PINEAPPLE BELONGS ON PIZZA
>PINEAPPLE BELONGS ON PIZZA
>PINEAPPLE BELONGS ON PIZZA
>PINEAPPLE BELONGS ON PIZZA
>PINEAPPLE BELONGS ON PIZZA
>PINEAPPLE BELONGS ON PIZZA
>PINEAPPLE BELONGS ON PIZZA
>PINEAPPLE BELONGS ON PIZZA
>PINEAPPLE BELONGS ON PIZZA
>PINEAPPLE BELONGS ON PIZZA
>PINEAPPLE BELONGS ON PIZZA
>PINEAPPLE BELONGS ON PIZZA
>PINEAPPLE BELONGS ON PIZZA
>PINEAPPLE BELONGS ON PIZZA
>PINEAPPLE BELONGS ON PIZZA
>PINEAPPLE BELONGS ON PIZZA
>PINEAPPLE BELONGS ON PIZZA
>PINEAPPLE BELONGS ON PIZZA
>PINEAPPLE BELONGS ON PIZZA
>PINEAPPLE BELONGS ON PIZZA
>have I made my point?
>I am sure you won't killfile me, because that would be censorship.

It's only censorship if he's doing it on behalf of Gordon, or if he hits
you upside the head with Gordon.