Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v1cimn$33u73$5@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Byte Addressability And Beyond Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 06:45:43 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 7 Message-ID: <v1cimn$33u73$5@dont-email.me> References: <v0s17o$2okf4$2@dont-email.me> <2024May3.171330@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <v13olm$p9ih$9@dont-email.me> <2024May4.111127@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <AnsZN.60734$gF_b.49289@fx17.iad> <v17dav$1o21q$2@dont-email.me> <YCNZN.77960$yf_8.61501@fx14.iad> <v18m0s$213qm$1@dont-email.me> <642cb7511c41a3931b06f747ea2161e4@www.novabbs.org> <v19d1t$2a6f8$1@dont-email.me> <v19gl2$2b44k$1@dont-email.me> <e10bcaa4cbad7113a2e630a236039c59@www.novabbs.org> <v1bigv$2q19c$1@dont-email.me> <0c13eeb8c7766f2900ee2f55f788a366@www.novabbs.org> <v1c3so$3195m$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 07 May 2024 08:45:43 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="30173f80060481ed31259743c2a7c1a1"; logging-data="3274979"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19/J4/MFK7LtRLTGXhhIApZ" User-Agent: Pan/0.155 (Kherson; fc5a80b8) Cancel-Lock: sha1:eWfRfKeDZRlW07ArY8Gpo3x/BkM= Bytes: 1742 On Mon, 6 May 2024 21:32:53 -0500, BGB wrote: > Yes, but then again, I make no claim that it is IEEE-754 conformant, > merely that it uses the same formats, and is "good enough" for most > stuff one needs an FPU for. That’s what all the hardware engineers thought, back in the 1990s.