Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v1dick$3b18a$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: OT: Atomic nucleus excited with laser: a breakthrough after
 decades
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 17:48:23 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <v1dick$3b18a$2@dont-email.me>
References: <v1ccs5$3vg2$1@solani.org> <v1damh$39abm$1@dont-email.me>
 <ubfk3jhv0jr2ee5k4gth9a1fa327lubuo9@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 07 May 2024 17:46:29 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="322ecfb41fba6482df7a21202d6cc2bd";
	logging-data="3507466"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX189Co3ZJ0DNtVV/q5g8mDq1"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.13.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:GMwFfK+/ak23A2+dVAUbo2m7G6c=
In-Reply-To: <ubfk3jhv0jr2ee5k4gth9a1fa327lubuo9@4ax.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2062

On 5/7/24 16:41, John Larkin wrote:
> On Tue, 7 May 2024 14:35:12 +0100, Martin Brown
> <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> wrote:
> 
>> On 07/05/2024 06:06, Jan Panteltje wrote:
>>> Atomic nucleus excited with laser: a breakthrough after decades
>>>    https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/04/240429103045.htm
>>>     The 'thorium transition', which has been sought after for decades,
>>>     has now been excited for the first time with lasers.
>>>     This paves the way for revolutionary high precision technologies, including nuclear clocks
>>
>> I wonder what the Q value for stimulated nuclear emission is?
> 
> "the correct energy of the thorium transition was hit exactly, the
> thorium nuclei delivered a clear signal for the first time. "
> 
> I wonder what that signal was.
> 

It says so in the paper: Fluorescent UV light.

Jeroen Belleman