Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v1fo8i$dt8i$1@i2pn2.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic Subject: Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H === Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 07:38:58 -0400 Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <v1fo8i$dt8i$1@i2pn2.org> References: <v18e32$1vbql$1@dont-email.me> <v1avuv$2lks2$1@dont-email.me> <v1b7gl$2ndka$1@dont-email.me> <v1c2ng$9f73$2@i2pn2.org> <v1c43h$3168a$1@dont-email.me> <v1c6g2$9f72$6@i2pn2.org> <v1c7ph$31thl$2@dont-email.me> <v1c8ne$9f72$7@i2pn2.org> <v1c8s6$3242s$1@dont-email.me> <v1c9gn$9f73$5@i2pn2.org> <v1c9m6$325ls$1@dont-email.me> <v1d2kp$9f72$10@i2pn2.org> <v1deh9$3a1rb$2@dont-email.me> <v1entj$cp5r$1@i2pn2.org> <v1eo9u$3nb4c$1@dont-email.me> <v1ep5l$cp5s$6@i2pn2.org> <v1eqpg$3nnch$2@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 11:38:58 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="455954"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg"; User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird In-Reply-To: <v1eqpg$3nnch$2@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Bytes: 3560 Lines: 68 On 5/7/24 11:16 PM, olcott wrote: > On 5/7/2024 9:48 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 5/7/24 10:33 PM, olcott wrote: >>> On 5/7/2024 9:26 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>> On 5/7/24 10:40 AM, olcott wrote: >>>> >>>>> It is the one that prove you don't tell the truth. >>>>> If you don't tell the truth about one thing then you >>>>> can't be trusted on the next. >>>> >>>> And thus, I guess we can just ignore everything you say, as you have >>>> been proven to lie many times in the past. >>> >>> I have never been proven to ever lie yet I did prove >>> that you told a falsehood. I assume this was unintentional >>> spouting off before you bothered to pay attention. >>> >> >> That is a LIE. >> >> You have just ignored every proof that you lied because you are just >> like that pillow guy. >> >> >>> That you claim to have proof just like the pillow guy >>> claims to have proof is ridiculously implausible on >>> the basis of your spouting off nonsense on this same >>> point. >>> >> >> Nope, I have SHOWN the proof. >> >> YOU ignored it. >> > > I completely ignored all of your messages for quite > a while, possibly weeks. Most of your messages were > hardly anything bedsides ad hominem attacks. And thus you can not honestly claim that I didn't say something. Thus, when you say no one has refuted you, you are saying a statement you know might not be true, and thus, you admit you LIE. And thus, by your logic, people should not believe anything you say. Are you going to show that you trust your own ideas, and risk promising to stop if you are actually wrong? > >> Are you willing to put up or shut up? >> >> or are you going to be chicken and just keep making your false >> statements that you don't beleive strongly enough to take a risk on them. >> >> I guess you are just a chicken liar. > > You have never not even once gone through every single > detail of any of my reasoning. > I have gone thorough enough to show it is wrong. Note, to prove something wrong, you need to find AN error, not ALL the errors. You are just proving you don't understand how logic works.