Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v1g1oa$jqf$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: MSNBC Host/Guest Worry Campus Protests Could Spark "Ferocious"
 Backlash, New Reagan Era
Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 10:20:58 -0400
Organization: Ph'nglui Mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh Wgah'nagl Fhtagn.
Lines: 81
Message-ID: <v1g1oa$jqf$2@dont-email.me>
References: <v13afm$m5op$3@dont-email.me>
 <vuof3j5f2ra0i2ldneekvfocft7imio17k@4ax.com> <v18oqr$21ll0$1@dont-email.me>
 <uIKcnQRtjbmml6X7nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <v19eqj$2anci$2@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-361D4E.20193505052024@news.giganews.com>
 <v1anlc$2jk4n$1@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-0DD231.12185506052024@news.giganews.com>
 <v1dfla$3af7n$2@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-148F37.12441907052024@news.giganews.com>
 <v1e0ra$3ej1v$1@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-CCDC41.13311307052024@news.giganews.com>
 <v1e4v2$3fjmi$1@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-9BD8FA.14240007052024@news.giganews.com>
Reply-To: fredp1571@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 08 May 2024 16:20:58 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="66aed0da88de21359d8b0e65836535d3";
	logging-data="20303"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+FuDt4umsjaZ3OnwLdnACW"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:78.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:sX34vIJER9ltALgNpFq9cPJfOrQ=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <atropos-9BD8FA.14240007052024@news.giganews.com>
Bytes: 4892

On 5/7/24 5:24 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <v1e4v2$3fjmi$1@dont-email.me>,
>   moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 5/7/2024 4:31 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article <v1e0ra$3ej1v$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>    moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 5/7/2024 3:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> In article <v1dfla$3af7n$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 5/6/24 3:18 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <v1anlc$2jk4n$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 5/5/24 11:19 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <v19eqj$2anci$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>       "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> May 5, 2024 at 1:05:47 PM PDT, Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Plenty of other Democrats were horrified at the societal
>>>>>>>>>>>> breakdown.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Twenty years ago, who would have thought that by 2024 the following
>>>>>>>>>>> statements would be politically explosive:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "Violent criminals should be arrested and sent to prison."
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "Men cannot give birth."
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Didn't you hear yesterday's advice on screening mammograms for trans
>>>>>>>>>> men starting at age 40?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You just say these things to trigger me, don't you?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You're a worse doctor than you are a lawyer... and that's saying
>>>>>>>> something.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So tell us the date of your last mammogram, Effa.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Had a full body scan about 7 years ago.
>>>>>
>>>>> I asked for the date of your last mammogram, so of course your response
>>>>> was something completely irrelevant to the question asked.
>>>>
>>>> 'Completely irrelevant'?  Really?
>>>
>>> Really.
>>
>> You have reason to think that a full body scan excludes breast tissue?
> 
> I have reason to think it's not a mammogram, which is an entirely
> different kind of procedure. If it weren't, women wouldn't need them.
> They could just do the full body scan that men do. No separate equipment
> or diagnostic procedures would be necessary.
> 


Fucking ignorant whining prick.  Wrong again, wrong always.

> Whole body MRI is highly accurate in the early detection of breast cancer metastases
> Source: American College of Radiology / American Roentgen Ray Society
> Summary:
> Whole body magnetic resonance imaging should be the imaging modality of choice for the detection of breast cancer metastases (when the cancer has spread beyond the breast) as it is highly accurate and can detect bone metastases while a patient is still asymptomatic (shows no symptoms), according to a new study.

Dimwitted Thanny is a much worse doctor than a lawyer.


-- 
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC 
Bible  25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0