Article <v1h93g$9f8v$1@dont-email.me>

Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <v1h93g$9f8v$1@dont-email.me>

Deutsch English Français Italiano

<v1h93g$9f8v$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.nobody.at!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: immibis <news@immibis.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H +++
Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 03:32:32 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <v1h93g$9f8v$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v18e32$1vbql$1@dont-email.me> <v18f9e$5asq$4@i2pn2.org>
 <v18nbf$21c98$1@dont-email.me> <v1c0p8$2skfl$3@dont-email.me>
 <v1c5fk$31a3g$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 09 May 2024 03:32:32 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c6dc48654a6055a6bf1d5d15d693492d";
	logging-data="310559"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+iRhfE2JhMtnjnu418XtN2"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:lpfHBkvjPK7t1XyjVhs5GQ1OvT0=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v1c5fk$31a3g$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2236

On 7/05/24 05:00, olcott wrote:
> On 5/6/2024 8:39 PM, immibis wrote:
>> On 5/05/24 21:40, olcott wrote:
>>> If you are claiming that you have some top secret proof that shows
>>> the above execution trace is incorrect I am taking this as the empty
>>> claims of evidence of election fraud that no one has ever seen.
>>
>> The simulated execution trace is proven incorrect because it is 
>> different from the actual execution trace.
>>
>> This is not top secret - it is very obvious.
>>
> 
> 00 int H(ptr x, ptr x)  // ptr is pointer to int function
> 01 int D(ptr x)
> 02 {
> 03   int Halt_Status = H(x, x);
> 04   if (Halt_Status)
> 05     HERE: goto HERE;
> 06   return Halt_Status;
> 07 }
> 08
> 09 int main()
> 10 {
> 11   H(D,D);
> 12 }
> 
> Every H/D pair in the universe where D(D) is simulated by the
> same H(D,D) that D(D) calls: AS IN THE ABOVE TEMPLATE
> Involves 1 to ∞ steps of D and also includes zero to ∞
> recursive simulations where H simulates itself simulating D(D).
> 

Does the one that simulates ∞ steps terminate?