Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v1j01f$pb7p$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: My 138 $ Amazon order ( for 6pm today ). Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 17:10:07 -0000 (UTC) Organization: the-candyden-of-code Lines: 66 Message-ID: <v1j01f$pb7p$1@dont-email.me> References: <Jeff-Relf.Me@Apr.30--1.52pm.Seattle.2024> <l2p23jphsoanasffl34bedtf6ngerbmt3p@4ax.com> <v0tppf$38keu$1@dont-email.me> <99253jp12e1cppj2940cpkpl0cbg1og25i@4ax.com> <v0u7ap$3bjck$1@dont-email.me> <r3d53j9ue89cpgk2nako6u1h559r6vch70@4ax.com> <8ce53j11p4ik1vvjt4tr5cod0ikd90jor8@4ax.com> <l9gd08FgusrU9@mid.individual.net> <mq683j18drilne63ug4g6584bl2q99v8a3@4ax.com> <6634d31c$0$6437$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <663b88b0$2$1258325$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <v1g6i3$hhp$2@dont-email.me> <663ba28b$0$7059$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <v1gbsl$30ta$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 09 May 2024 19:10:08 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="66a87544313f6736c2791b88dd146fc2"; logging-data="830713"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/EvyNKVXhZcGuY+ZSs0A1OsHcwBzaFsaP0VG/EQpRoBA==" User-Agent: slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:3ojlYqwmLNpZ0+1gv+glroilcok= X-Face: b{dPmN&%4|lEo,wUO\"KLEOu5N_br(N2Yuc5/qcR5i>9-!^e\.Tw9?/m0}/~:UOM:Zf]% b+ V4R8q|QiU/R8\|G\WpC`-s?=)\fbtNc&=/a3a)r7xbRI]Vl)r<%PTriJ3pGpl_/B6!8pe\btzx `~R! r3.0#lHRE+^Gro0[cjsban'vZ#j7,?I/tHk{s=TFJ:H?~=]`O*~3ZX`qik`b:.gVIc-[$t/e ZrQsWJ >|l^I_[pbsIqwoz.WGA]<D Bytes: 4671 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote at 17:13 this Wednesday (GMT): > On 2024-05-08 12:04 p.m., DFS wrote: >> On 5/8/2024 11:42 AM, Andrzej Matuch wrote: >>> On 2024-05-08 10:14 a.m., DFS wrote: >>>> On 5/3/2024 5:05 AM, Andrzej Matuch wrote: >>>> >>>>> The mere fact that it is no longer possible to install Windows >>>>> without being forced to enter a Microsoft account speaks volumes >>>>> about where the tech world is going. >>>> >>>> >>>> I also thought that was true (as of Win11), but I found out it's not. >>>> >>>> Last night I screwed up my Win11 Pro install, bad, by stopping the >>>> wrong services. Had no system restore points, so ended up reinstalling. >>>> >>>> During the reinstall, instead of choosing 'This PC will be used at >>>> home' or whatever it says, choose the other option 'To be used at work'. >>>> >>>> Then you don't have to enter a MS email - you can use whatever >>>> email/domain you want to continue the install. >>>> >>>> Problem solved! >>>> >>>> But it caused a new problem: under Windows Security | Virus & threat >>>> protection it said 'Action needed'. When I clicked, it said to >>>> contact the IT Adminstrator for your company. >>>> >>>> Googled and found this solution: >>>> >>>> https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/answers/questions/1367032/in-my-windows-11-virus-and-threat-protection-missi >>>> >>>> Add a simple Registry key and it's fixed. >>>> >>>> https://imgur.com/a/G7HZ7Lm >>>> >>>> >>>> This is less trouble than using an MS email to install, then going >>>> back and changing your user profile (because the user profile is >>>> named with the first 5 letters of the MS email acct). >>> >>> So, we're still jumping through hoops to get the system to work the >>> way we want it to. It's quite annoying. >> >> It is. It happened because I chose to install the system as part of a >> corporate network, and "the corp" controls security settings. Install >> it for home use and that doesn't happen (but then you have to phone home >> with an MS email). >> >> >> At least Windows doesn't display non-working app menu items, as Linux >> used to do a LOT. Click them and nothing happens. Resolving them was >> FAR more troublesome than the Registry fix I showed. > > I'll be the first to admit that as much as I like using Linux and the > ideas behind it, I had to stop using it as a result of the lack of > polish. Ubuntu is better because they at least make an attempt to > provide is as a serious alternative for corporate environments. It, > Fedora and openSUSE are the only ones with polish, but the latter two > are slaves to the homosexual agenda. Fair.. there is a lot of style inconsistency. It doesn't bother me as much, but its definitely there. -- user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom