Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android
Subject: Re: call from 510-854-4017 legit or not ?
Date: 10 May 2024 14:30:35 GMT
Organization: NOYB
Lines: 49
Message-ID: <v1li2l.1f8.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net>
References: <v1b244$2m6pp$2@dont-email.me> <v1ba85$2ntb6$2@dont-email.me> <v1blam$2qgha$1@dont-email.me> <MPG.40a54bad1582ebfb9902da@news.individual.net> <v1jrcl$vc8g$1@dont-email.me> <v1js6k$vjcp$1@dont-email.me> <g13r3j51arpjd952s1hnchblah1hvfsq1b@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net 1coCpDINwzVXJLoRSMI3AwN5+CK7NZ/Ya1mAeBIMskXQ5mChFh
X-Orig-Path: not-for-mail
Cancel-Lock: sha1:In83vk+yttpoN7uesWt9NYQ+rJk= sha256:bF00irmeoOd9yS9VdCqEPPP6hNGtJWeL40ZOsyDekCc=
User-Agent: tin/1.6.2-20030910 ("Pabbay") (UNIX) (CYGWIN_NT-10.0-WOW/2.8.0(0.309/5/3) (i686)) Hamster/2.0.2.2
Bytes: 2897

micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> wrote:
> In comp.mobile.android, on Thu, 9 May 2024 18:10:42 -0700, The Real Bev
> <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> >On 5/9/24 5:56 PM, Adam wrote:
> >> On 05/08/2024 09:43 AM, Stan Brown wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 6 May 2024 18:24:21 -0400, knuttle wrote:
> >>>> Subject: Re: call from 510-854-4017 legit or not ?
> >>>> Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android
> >>>> Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 18:24:21 -0400
> >>>> From: knuttle <keith_nuttle@yahoo.com>
> >>>> Message-ID: <v1blam$2qgha$1@dont-email.me>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 05/06/2024 3:15 PM, Jörg Lorenz wrote:
> >>>>> [quoted text muted]
> >>>>> the name of the caller and let them proceed to the answering machine.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> That solves 90% of the cases.
> >>>>>
> >>>> Google search on the number 510-854-4017
> >>>>
> >>>> returns this page
> >>>> https://directory.youmail.com/phone/510-248-4017
> >>>>
> >>>> (510) 248-4017 is a Debt Collector
> >>>> Name    Debt Collector    Location    Fremont, CA US
> >>>
> >>> I saw that too, and nearly posted the same thing. But I noticed in
> >>> time that the phone number returned in the Google results is not the
> >>> same as the phone number searched for (854 versus 248).
> >>>
> >>> Google searches are getting worse and worse, month by month and year
> >>> by year.
> 
> Giving a hit with a partly different phone number is not an example of
> gettting worse.  They always have given close when they can't find
> exact. 

  Indeed. Keith (Nuttle) probably didn't do an exact search, because if
you do - i.e. double quotes around the phone number - the first result
*does* list the specified number.

<https://www.google.com/search?q=what+is+phone+number+%22510-854-4017%22>

-> <https://directory.youmail.com/phone/510-854-1594> ->

"(510) 854-1594 is a Preapproved Loan Scam"

[...]