Article <v1mks9$1q5ee$2@dont-email.me>

Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <v1mks9$1q5ee$2@dont-email.me>

Deutsch English Français Italiano

<v1mks9$1q5ee$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.logic,comp.theory
Subject: Re: Termination analyzer defined
Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 21:24:09 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <v1mks9$1q5ee$2@dont-email.me>
References: <v1me7i$1l6ut$1@dont-email.me> <v1mftm$1lgcc$1@dont-email.me>
 <v1mke2$lbo5$6@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 11 May 2024 04:24:10 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4d0dff08c358270f818af19f82bcfe8c";
	logging-data="1906126"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18IO6M5KDGsIqEdE2pL8D+l"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:0kB00bmzHtj96GKSvsMPCefTPck=
In-Reply-To: <v1mke2$lbo5$6@i2pn2.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2273

On 5/10/2024 9:16 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 5/10/24 8:59 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 5/10/2024 7:30 PM, olcott wrote:
>>> A termination analyzer is different than a halt decider in that it need
>>> not correctly determine the halt status of every input. For the purposes
>>> of this paper a termination analyzer only needs to correctly determine
>>> the halt status of one terminating input and one non-terminating input.
>>> The computer science equivalent would be a halt decider with a limited
>>> domain that includes at least one halting and one non-halting input.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> So all the people that said termination analyzer WAS NOT DEFINED
>> never meant that termination analyzer WAS NOT DEFINED. They all
>> meant that it was not defined well enough directly in my paper
>> even though it it a current term-of-the-art.
>>
> 
> Do you have a reference which uses that definition?
> 
> Not just something you said yourself?


Now that I understand that ALL of the people that said my terms
were undefined NEVER meant that they were actually undefined I
can fix this.



-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer