Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Blue Bloods "Two of a Kind" 5/10/2024 (was: What Did You Watch? 2024-05-10 (Friday))
Date: Sat, 11 May 2024 22:37:39 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 80
Message-ID: <v1orvj$29h0g$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v1o3a0$23l1s$1@dont-email.me> <20240511152138.00003aaa@example.com>
Injection-Date: Sun, 12 May 2024 00:37:40 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="88b578cc166cbaa67d93d90d9817f61f";
	logging-data="2409488"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Ks1jf+BU7/gHOlq3pbdcGDm307DyAtuA="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:klnd2nMXLVordK+rKEgHbmEfIDw=
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Bytes: 5390

Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

>Blue Bloods - the penultimate episode of season 14A. Season 14B will
>apparently be just 4 episodes unless the cast and producers of the show
>manage to convince CBS to un-cancel it. Frankly - forgive the
>inadvertent pun - if I was another network with some holes in my Friday
>night schedule, I'd look seriously at picking this up. Apparently, the
>ratings are still very strong (despite the ever-weaker writing) and
>everyone still wants to do it so why not? 

>As for plot, we see the first time in a very long time where
>Danny's plumper son finally got something to do but sit at the dinner
>table. After being robbed on campus, he and his dad set out to catch
>the robber. Also, Eddie and her partner untangle a landlord-tenant
>dispute that turns out to be more complicated than it appears. Erin
>discovers a legal aid attorney is not giving his client good advice and
>works to take down the attorney which has unexpected consequences for
>the client. Jamie and Joe Hill actually engage in some off-duty
>fisticuffs - with each other! - and Frank has to figure out how to make
>them get along. 

Gawd this was awful. None of the stories had anything resembling a plot.
Is Sean supposed to be at Columbia? The student robbery plot was
ridiculous. Danny tells Sean to wait till the next night, and all he's
going to have Sean do is wait at the police station for the identity
parade. Instead Sean goes out that night, interferes with another
robbery in exactly the same spot, recognizes the robber as an employee
and gets stabbed. The victim thinks Sean saved her and he gets a date.
Fortunately for the purpose of Danny not having to do any investigating,
the perpetrator returns to work and gets arrested. Based on the Law of
Conservation of Characters, the mastermind is the head of campus
security who had recruited ex cons for campus jobs then told them whom
to rob. Not sure how he was tracking student movement.

Wow this script goes out of its way to make Edit massively stupid. In
the landlord-tenant dispute, once again, Edit immediately sympathized
with the landlady who claimed the tenant had threatened her on several
occassions but never once filed a complaint nor did she try to force the
tenant to move. She also lied to police about her wherabouts. The case
is blown wide open because Edit and Badillo have found all of the stolen
furniture and personal effects in a storage locker rented by the
tenants. This would have required a moving truck that no one saw despite
the florist across the street watching every movement.

I had no idea Edit had access to Penelope's couch database, now
updated to include storage space rental agreements.

The wife was setting up the landlady out of revenge for the affair she
had with her husband, wrecking their marriage. Edit helpfully opines
that the husband, only, was at fault. Last I looked, it took two to
cheat. The only thing they can think of to charge the wife with is
making a false police report.

Erin's story is beyond awful. She completely sympathizes with a criminal
who is facing numerous "possession of" charges as a getaway driver, and
offers the guy a ridiculous plea bargain, which he rejects. Erin raises
an objection at arraignment to the failure to plead guilty.

Can she do that? Obviously the defendant has a right to trial.

The defendant keeps insisting that he's innocent, that he had no idea
what his co-conspirator was going to put into his car. Well, he KNEW it
was a burglarly, so whatever was going to be put into his car would be
stolen goods. That's kind of how burglarly works.

The defense lawyer is representing both conspirators but this defendant
is unaware of the enormous ethical conflict. Somehow his fighting his
own charges is better for the other defendant? It makes no sense.

Surely the two men would have been tried simultaneously and the lawyer
representing both couldn't have been hidden. Even if both defendants
waived conflict, the judge sure as hell would have said something.

For no particular reason, Joe Hill and Jamie get into a stupid fight.
Jamie is being such an ass that Joe is less unsympathetic. Franks
threatens to make them ride together in uniform in the highest crime
beat at night but they end up walking during daylight on a street
without crime.

I think I hit the lowlights. Was Baez even on episode? I don't recall.