Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v1rtuq$37l07$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: [OT] Professor inflitrates pro-Palestinian encampment; union
 leader calls for consequences
Date: Sun, 12 May 2024 22:29:46 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <v1rtuq$37l07$1@dont-email.me>
References: <20240505204412.000020d9@example.com>
 <v1lpp9$1gnv5$1@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-C514B8.15165012052024@news.giganews.com>
 <v1rhbi$31ea6$1@dont-email.me>
 <pAadnbLSD9TW19z7nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 04:29:46 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c1730ace7618f99c718c5118c481b7e9";
	logging-data="3396615"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+2UOGW/FwuRncgTp0r9bclhZ/81pCsQ0s="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:h/UquFWMnTqP6sKtFmHiM9wNcxM=
In-Reply-To: <pAadnbLSD9TW19z7nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2674

On 5/12/2024 7:01 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> On May 12, 2024 at 3:54:42 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 5/12/2024 6:16 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>   In article <v1lpp9$1gnv5$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>     moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>   
>>>>   On 5/10/2024 1:56 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>   
>>>>>   And now the Scarf Lady, Dr. Deborah Birx, says that thousands of Americans
>>>>>   could be injured from the mRNA Wuhan Flu shot and that some groups should
>>>>>   not have been forced to get the jab.
>>>>>
>>>>>   Weird how she wasn't saying that when Biden's decree was "take the shot or
>>>>>   you're fired" in the federal government. Back then, she and your vaunted
>>>>>   'fact checkers' would only repeat the mantra that it's 'safe and
>>>>>   effective'.
>>>>
>>>>   You mean it *shouldn't* have been called safe and effective?...
>>>   
>>>   Ask the people who were injured from the jab whether they think the
>>>   government should have told them it was safe.
>>
>> I'm asking what a responsible public health official ought to have said.
> 
> How about the truth?

The truth is that every medical procedure *including NO procedure* 
carries some risk.  What a responsible health official is tasked with is 
communicating in a way that best serves the public.  In this instance, 
the vaccine was thought to be much, much safer than not getting one.