Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v1t63q$3g95i$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic Subject: Re: A computable function that reports on the behavior of its actual self is not allowed Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 15:55:04 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 24 Message-ID: <v1t63q$3g95i$1@dont-email.me> References: <v1r566$2uo21$1@dont-email.me> <v1smrp$3clsp$1@dont-email.me> <v1t563$3g3o3$2@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 15:55:06 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7c1f5cffd887f47f9baf2619196514f6"; logging-data="3679410"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+j/4jTocY2jWBqDPBoANxA" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:Vo9J/Bxytl0NSnrpb2qCvjuiBb0= In-Reply-To: <v1t563$3g3o3$2@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-GB Bytes: 2299 Op 13.mei.2024 om 15:39 schreef olcott: > On 5/13/2024 4:34 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >> Op 12.mei.2024 om 21:27 schreef olcott: >>> Computable functions are the basic objects of study in computability >>> theory. Computable functions are the formalized analogue of the >>> intuitive notion of algorithms, in the sense that a function is >>> computable if there exists an algorithm that can do the job of the >>> function, i.e. given an input of the function domain it can return the >>> corresponding output. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computable_function >>> >>> A computable function that reports on the behavior of its actual >>> self (or reports on the behavior of its caller) is not allowed. >> >> So, olcott uses his authority to create a new problem. Why would >> anybody be interested in such limitation? >> > > The definition of computable function is an axiomatic basis > not any mere authority. I was referring to the "is not allowed". If olcott uses his authority to introduce a new axiom with this sentence, a new problem is created. Who is interested in a system with this new limitation?