Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v1u201$3mvsa$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: immibis <news@immibis.com> Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic Subject: Re: A computable function that reports on the behavior of its actual self is not allowed Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 23:50:56 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 24 Message-ID: <v1u201$3mvsa$2@dont-email.me> References: <v1r566$2uo21$1@dont-email.me> <v1smrp$3clsp$1@dont-email.me> <v1t563$3g3o3$2@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 23:50:57 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d2008c1c49405973cf4ca07ee8802bc1"; logging-data="3899274"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19cfEFCJOaXUt/RXs+kIOEy" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:oOJqcyCuvi2koYgp2LDHt3k1SdA= In-Reply-To: <v1t563$3g3o3$2@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2306 On 13/05/24 15:39, olcott wrote: > On 5/13/2024 4:34 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >> Op 12.mei.2024 om 21:27 schreef olcott: >>> Computable functions are the basic objects of study in computability >>> theory. Computable functions are the formalized analogue of the >>> intuitive notion of algorithms, in the sense that a function is >>> computable if there exists an algorithm that can do the job of the >>> function, i.e. given an input of the function domain it can return the >>> corresponding output. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computable_function >>> >>> A computable function that reports on the behavior of its actual >>> self (or reports on the behavior of its caller) is not allowed. >> >> So, olcott uses his authority to create a new problem. Why would >> anybody be interested in such limitation? >> > > The definition of computable function is an axiomatic basis > not any mere authority. > There's no axiom that says computable functions aren't allowed to have themselves as input. If you write a function that tests whether a number is prime, you can give its own Gödel number as input to see whether its Gödel number is prime. That is not a problem.