Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: [OT] Professor inflitrates pro-Palestinian encampment; union
 leader calls for consequences
Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 17:57:02 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 69
Message-ID: <v1u2bf$3n232$1@dont-email.me>
References: <20240505204412.000020d9@example.com>
 <v1lpp9$1gnv5$1@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-C514B8.15165012052024@news.giganews.com>
 <v1rhbi$31ea6$1@dont-email.me>
 <pAadnbLSD9TW19z7nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <v1rtuq$37l07$1@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-F73D18.19593612052024@news.giganews.com>
 <v1tb17$3hi6h$1@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-FDC779.10472413052024@news.giganews.com>
 <v1tp0v$3krav$1@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-859A07.13351913052024@news.giganews.com>
Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 23:57:03 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c1730ace7618f99c718c5118c481b7e9";
	logging-data="3901538"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18M7MAjsgQBxPuB+oQ9OtDEEZS1Xw7ARtU="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:qE5GRpoipueqxxTK5s0sHTqFTIg=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <atropos-859A07.13351913052024@news.giganews.com>
Bytes: 4500

On 5/13/2024 4:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <v1tp0v$3krav$1@dont-email.me>,
>   moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 5/13/2024 1:47 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article <v1tb17$3hi6h$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>    moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 5/12/2024 10:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> In article <v1rtuq$37l07$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>     moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 5/12/2024 7:01 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>> On May 12, 2024 at 3:54:42 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 5/12/2024 6:16 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>      In article <v1lpp9$1gnv5$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>        moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>      
>>>>>>>>>>      On 5/10/2024 1:56 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>      
>>>>>>>>>>> And now the Scarf Lady, Dr. Deborah Birx, says that thousands of
>>>>>>>>>>> Americans could be injured from the mRNA Wuhan Flu shot and that
>>>>>>>>>>> some groups should not have been forced to get the jab.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Weird how she wasn't saying that when Biden's decree was "take the
>>>>>>>>>>> shot or you're fired" in the federal government. Back then, she
>>>>>>>>>>> and your vaunted 'fact checkers' would only repeat the mantra that
>>>>>>>>>>> it's 'safe and effective'.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You mean it *shouldn't* have been called safe and effective?...
>>>>>>>>>      
>>>>>>>>> Ask the people who were injured from the jab whether they think the
>>>>>>>>> government should have told them it was safe.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm asking what a responsible public health official ought to have
>>>>>>>> said.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How about the truth?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The truth is that every medical procedure *including NO procedure*
>>>>>> carries some risk.
>>>>>
>>>>> And an ethical medical professional explains the type and extent of that
>>>>> risk, as well as its frequency of occurrence in the population.
>>>>>
>>>>> They don't ignore the risk and just tell you "it's safe and effective".
>>>>> (And don't forget the denigration and censorship of anyone who suggested
>>>>> otherwise, who have yet again turned out to be right in the end.)
>>>>
>>>> People who know there's always a small risk don't need to be told. And
>>>> people who *don't* know it will grossly overreact when they *are* told.
>>>
>>> So once again, it's okay for the government to lie to us for our own
>>> good.
>>>    
>>>> So, the public at large heard "safe and effective", which, in context,
>>>> the vaccine very much was. Meanwhile, one needn't support censorship to
>>>> strongly disapprove of sensationalist life-threatening disinformation.
>>
>> Once again, real-world decisions appear simplest to those who don't have
>> to make them. But happily, in this instance, the vaccine *was* safe.
> 
> Except for the people who were injured by it.

This just in:  Don't risk getting out of bed tomorrow...