Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: [OT] Professor inflitrates pro-Palestinian encampment; union
 leader calls for consequences
Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 19:06:42 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 82
Message-ID: <v1u6e3$3o2h8$1@dont-email.me>
References: <20240505204412.000020d9@example.com>
 <v1lpp9$1gnv5$1@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-C514B8.15165012052024@news.giganews.com>
 <v1rhbi$31ea6$1@dont-email.me>
 <pAadnbLSD9TW19z7nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <v1rtuq$37l07$1@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-F73D18.19593612052024@news.giganews.com>
 <v1tb17$3hi6h$1@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-FDC779.10472413052024@news.giganews.com>
 <v1tp0v$3krav$1@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-859A07.13351913052024@news.giganews.com>
 <v1u2bf$3n232$1@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-ACE9E8.15333813052024@news.giganews.com>
Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 01:06:44 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1fc6a22e3e780876bb90be025b106293";
	logging-data="3934760"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19L+FMCA3LDq2egWcn+Us3WbSpTwhWRNlI="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:HarTOj6LXgDg3636TXSTRvuiYsY=
In-Reply-To: <atropos-ACE9E8.15333813052024@news.giganews.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 5389

On 5/13/2024 6:33 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <v1u2bf$3n232$1@dont-email.me>,
>   moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 5/13/2024 4:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article <v1tp0v$3krav$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>    moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 5/13/2024 1:47 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> In article <v1tb17$3hi6h$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>     moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 5/12/2024 10:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <v1rtuq$37l07$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>      moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 5/12/2024 7:01 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On May 12, 2024 at 3:54:42 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 5/12/2024 6:16 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>       In article <v1lpp9$1gnv5$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>>>         moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>>>>>       On 5/10/2024 1:56 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>>>>>> And now the Scarf Lady, Dr. Deborah Birx, says that thousands of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Americans could be injured from the mRNA Wuhan Flu shot and that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> some groups should not have been forced to get the jab.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Weird how she wasn't saying that when Biden's decree was "take the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> shot or you're fired" in the federal government. Back then, she
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and your vaunted 'fact checkers' would only repeat the mantra that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's 'safe and effective'.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You mean it *shouldn't* have been called safe and effective?...
>>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>>>> Ask the people who were injured from the jab whether they think the
>>>>>>>>>>> government should have told them it was safe.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm asking what a responsible public health official ought to have
>>>>>>>>>> said.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> How about the truth?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The truth is that every medical procedure *including NO procedure*
>>>>>>>> carries some risk.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And an ethical medical professional explains the type and extent of that
>>>>>>> risk, as well as its frequency of occurrence in the population.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> They don't ignore the risk and just tell you "it's safe and effective".
>>>>>>> (And don't forget the denigration and censorship of anyone who suggested
>>>>>>> otherwise, who have yet again turned out to be right in the end.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> People who know there's always a small risk don't need to be told. And
>>>>>> people who *don't* know it will grossly overreact when they *are* told.
>>>>>
>>>>> So once again, it's okay for the government to lie to us for our own
>>>>> good.
>>>>>     
>>>>>> So, the public at large heard "safe and effective", which, in context,
>>>>>> the vaccine very much was. Meanwhile, one needn't support censorship to
>>>>>> strongly disapprove of sensationalist life-threatening disinformation.
>>>>
>>>> Once again, real-world decisions appear simplest to those who don't have
>>>> to make them. But happily, in this instance, the vaccine *was* safe.
>>>
>>> Except for the people who were injured by it.
>>
>> This just in:  Don't risk getting out of bed tomorrow...
> 
> This just in: People have a right to know all the risks of drugs they're
> not just being asked to take, but ordered to take under threat of loss
> of their livelihood.

I'll bet that *all* the risks of *any* vaccine will run to thousands of 
words ...and, further, that they're as close as your nearest Internet 
portal.  And that's not what people want.  What people want is sound 
advice, insofar as any can survive a free-for-all of second-guessing.