Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Wildlife agents need warrants to place cameras on private property (was: Fourteenth and a half amendment: Warrantless searches of two PA hunt clubs by game wardens upheld at trial court)
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 20:06:21 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <v20g7t$c4u8$1@dont-email.me>
References: <umhltb$645$1@dont-email.me> <v2061t$9ndt$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-0ED4CB.11071914052024@news.giganews.com> <3bf74jpgrplt5f9fhm48ti792hg28i7hr4@4ax.com>
Injection-Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 22:06:22 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="fbd83f39dc1f09deea6698a307cfbe37";
	logging-data="398280"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX190UiNdiGtU6kYOxUG8evYO9Dth4BcB6zw="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:VrAnbgISYiiPL/FEI4Q5H6mAlJI=
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Bytes: 1821

shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:

>>. . . 

>One would think they aren't just going out and placing these cameras
>randomly. So they've either heard or been told of people shooting (and
>presumably hunting) on the land. As that's the only reason I can see
>them deciding to place the cameras on that land. Which would suggest
>that , at least in the case of someone reporting the shooting/hunting,
>that there was time to get a warrant.

Randomly or not, there's no concern with immediate loss of evidence as
these cameras are placed for a month at a time. Lehto's point is that
there's clearly time to obtain a warrant.

>>>. . .