| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<v22gad$tjgs$4@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: Is Richard a Liar? No!
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 09:19:57 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 68
Message-ID: <v22gad$tjgs$4@dont-email.me>
References: <v18e32$1vbql$1@dont-email.me> <v1q9fp$qb0p$1@i2pn2.org>
<v1qmq8$2prs6$1@dont-email.me> <v1qouc$2qb2s$1@dont-email.me>
<v1vbpd$3gbc$1@dont-email.me> <v1vslr$7enr$1@dont-email.me>
<v1vuor$24b2$1@news.muc.de> <v20027$865j$1@dont-email.me>
<v200oo$843p$1@dont-email.me> <v200u2$8dd9$1@dont-email.me>
<v202k0$8q16$1@dont-email.me> <v20654$9o07$1@dont-email.me>
<v2086v$a4tr$1@dont-email.me> <v208db$a6jn$1@dont-email.me>
<v20ak6$an12$1@dont-email.me> <v20b6v$akk9$1@dont-email.me>
<v22e19$2u32$1@news.muc.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 16:19:57 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0b1a5f306bf9a6832a28841b3fc547c1";
logging-data="970268"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18CgpQKQeMttqgsSZ9XLW0Z"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:DBy4AyH08dKZx1FI7mqC7+SmLvs=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v22e19$2u32$1@news.muc.de>
Bytes: 3608
On 5/15/2024 8:40 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> [ Followup-To: set ]
>
> In comp.theory olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 5/14/2024 1:30 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>> Op 14.mei.2024 om 19:52 schreef olcott:
>>>> On 5/14/2024 12:49 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>
> [ .... ]
>
>>>>>>>>>>> In comp.theory olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> [ .... ]
>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 00 int H(ptr x, ptr x) // ptr is pointer to int function
>>>>>>>>>>>> 01 int D(ptr x)
>>>>>>>>>>>> 02 {
>>>>>>>>>>>> 03 int Halt_Status = H(x, x);
>>>>>>>>>>>> 04 if (Halt_Status)
>>>>>>>>>>>> 05 HERE: goto HERE;
>>>>>>>>>>>> 06 return Halt_Status;
>>>>>>>>>>>> 07 }
>>>>>>>>>>>> 08
>>>>>>>>>>>> 09 int main()
>>>>>>>>>>>> 10 {
>>>>>>>>>>>> 11 H(D,D);
>>>>>>>>>>>> 12 }
>
> [ .... ]
>
>>>>> But nobody here knows the proof for your assertion above, that it is
>>>>> a verified fact that it cannot reach past line 03. So, we would like
>>>>> to see that proof. Just the claim that it has been proven is not enough.
>
>>>> The "nobody here" you are referring to must be clueless
>>>> about the semantics of the C programming language.
>
>>> Are you honest? Please, give the proof, instead of keeping away from it.
>
>> I have been an expert C/C++ programmer for decades.
>
> I see evidence to the contrary.
*Switching away from the topic of the post is not a rebuttal*
*Switching away from the topic of the post is not a rebuttal*
*Switching away from the topic of the post is not a rebuttal*
Message-ID: <v0ummt$2qov3$2@i2pn2.org>
On 5/1/2024 7:28 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 5/1/24 11:51 AM, olcott wrote:
*When Richard interprets*
*Every D simulated by H that cannot possibly*
*stop running unless aborted by H*
as *D NEVER simulated by H*
Richard is saying
for all "D simulated by H" there exists at least
one element of "D NEVER simulated by H"
Can this be an honest mistake?
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer