Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v22iut$ucl3$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Clive Arthur <clive@nowaytoday.co.uk>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: Dressing RG6
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 16:05:00 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <v22iut$ucl3$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v204qu$99qs$1@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: clive@nowaytoday.co.uk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 17:05:01 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1a1a96da760199d2ac109c7345c4e795";
	logging-data="996003"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19nbc5bODloWm2ZC+M6i++JsuU/ry1Fiow="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:mdMjsETL0HPQgJDNlKAQBHAhPHw=
In-Reply-To: <v204qu$99qs$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-GB
Bytes: 1785

On 14/05/2024 17:51, Don Y wrote:
> I've several short (a few feet) lengths of RG6 that I
> would like to "strongly coerce" into assuming a particular
> dressing.
> 
> Securing the cables to a stationary surface isn't practical
> without significantly lengthening them and distorting
> their "natural" routing.
> 
> But, ISTM that I should be able to slip each cable into
> a comparable diameter copper (?) pipe and then use traditional
> tools to bend that pipe into the appropriate configuration.
> I'd have to observe constraints like minimum bend radius
> but are there other issues that I might "discover" down the
> road?

How about semi-rigid adhesive lined heat shrink tubing?

https://www.farnell.com/datasheets/3758112.pdf

-- 
Cheers
Clive