Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v22ncp$14b7c$1@i2pn2.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: joes <noreply@example.com> Newsgroups: sci.logic,comp.theory Subject: Re: Is Richard a Liar? Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 16:20:42 -0000 (UTC) Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <v22ncp$14b7c$1@i2pn2.org> References: <v18e32$1vbql$1@dont-email.me> <v1m1bf$lbo5$4@i2pn2.org> <v1m2hc$1ijhr$1@dont-email.me> <v1m31m$lbo4$1@i2pn2.org> <v1m4et$1iv85$1@dont-email.me> <v1m5co$lbo4$2@i2pn2.org> <v1m71h$1jnpi$1@dont-email.me> <v1m7mh$lbo5$5@i2pn2.org> <v1mb8f$1kgpl$1@dont-email.me> <v1mkf8$lbo5$7@i2pn2.org> <v1mkmm$1q5ee$1@dont-email.me> <v1na6f$1ugl0$1@dont-email.me> <v1o67n$24f4c$1@dont-email.me> <v1q1ie$2l40t$1@dont-email.me> <v1q9fp$qb0p$1@i2pn2.org> <v1qmq8$2prs6$1@dont-email.me> <v1qouc$2qb2s$1@dont-email.me> <v1vbpd$3gbc$1@dont-email.me> <v1vslr$7enr$1@dont-email.me> <v1vuor$24b2$1@news.muc.de> <v20027$865j$1@dont-email.me> <v200oo$843p$1@dont-email.me> <v200u2$8dd9$1@dont-email.me> <v202k0$8q16$1@dont-email.me> <v20654$9o07$1@dont-email.me> <v2086v$a4tr$1@dont-email.me> <v208db$a6jn$1@dont-email.me> <v20ak6$an12$1@dont-email.me> <v20b6v$akk9$1@dont-email.me> <v20cf4$11h4n$3@i2pn2.org> <v20ect$bki0$1@dont-email.me> <v21r2l$otc2$1@dont-email.me> <v22j90$u8vi$4@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 16:20:42 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="1191148"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM"; User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Bytes: 2437 Lines: 16 Am Wed, 15 May 2024 10:10:24 -0500 schrieb olcott: > On 5/15/2024 3:17 AM, Mikko wrote: >> On 2024-05-14 19:34:52 +0000, olcott said: >> >>> *Anyone that says that I am wrong without knowing C is dishonest* >> First you should prove that you know C. > Not at all. Not in the least. Deductive proofs cannot rely on an > argument from authority. Contradiction in three lines. > Anyone that knows C and claims that I am wrong either provides the > required single valid counter-example proving that I am wrong or meets > the [definition] of defamation cases. Or doesn’t care. -- joes