Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Andrew <andrew@spam.net>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.system,comp.mobile.ipad
Subject: Re: Yet again, Apple forgot to sufficiently test desktop & iOS versions
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 19:04:48 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: BWH Usenet Archive (https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com)
Message-ID: <v2310f$2khe$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
References: <v213g8$oi4$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <laimsbFmkmhU5@mid.individual.net> <v21i02$msue$2@dont-email.me> <lak0udFsppbU2@mid.individual.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 19:04:48 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com;
	logging-data="86574"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blueworldhosting.com"
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ROrtW30mYYCFR1+YcixTJBI0PUw= sha256:219jJZkeVvC4eA8dV+YfXJ+E2UhgbCstsoT2/LDIsFY=
	sha1:U5DMNKDUcoB+zrk1/N+x2t9PgXg= sha256:PtnFLGyBE6hfrKRNuRzbiHbsjNO99KBCPeizTVS9lIg=
X-Newsreader: Mod.PiaoHong.Usenet.Client:2.02.M16
Bytes: 2621
Lines: 26

Bear in mind I stated a fact that was relevant to the subject line, 
and which was temporal and which affected those in the newsgroup line.

You're welcome to filter me out but if you do, you lose those facts.

Jolly Roger and Joerg Lorenz only provided negative value in noise.
a. Joerg I don't see but he's nothing but a jughead of no value.
b. Jolly Roger is using classic whataboutism to deflect from the subject
   <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism>
   "Whataboutism or whataboutery (as in "what about...?") is a 
    pejorative for the strategy of responding to an accusation 
    with a counter-accusation instead of a defense of the 
    original accusation. From a logical and argumentative point
    of view, whataboutism is considered a variant of the tu-quoque 
    pattern (Latin 'you too', term for a counter-accusation), 
    which is a subtype of the ad-hominem argument.
    The communication intent is often to distract from the content 
    of a topic (red herring). "

What Jolly Roger is trying to do is distract the topic away from
the fact that the data was correct about the Apple zero-day holes.

Jolly Roger used his classic ad hominem attack to deflect from that.

It's classic because Jolly Roger has no defense to the facts.
And Joerg... well... everyone has him filtered out already, don't they?