Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v23ibo$15lvn$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: fast discrete PHEMT one-shot
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 00:00:56 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <v23ibo$15lvn$1@dont-email.me>
References: <q0p94jh3tkrbenq67jpbkpfb45e744cpt5@4ax.com>
 <88dc3fcf-7731-cc95-3bb5-80d5cbd6edc9@electrooptical.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 02:00:56 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2ac6ef4b2cfc04580f0335287eb003a2";
	logging-data="1234935"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX181pgh46HUQqR1HAhiYXtd1"
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:x+kIY+91vwXMi09BqVEcTdipJLw=
	sha1:ewTfMILuIJC5qtU02m0OsaS7gP0=
Bytes: 2396

Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:
> On 2024-05-15 12:47, John Larkin wrote:
>> 
>> https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/agatzclr8pvr5470g6mc4/Phemt_One_Shot_1.jpg?rlkey=cwnx0qd7ajgnh8otf627x5lku&raw=1
>> 
>> Regular monostables are terribly slow. This one has low prop delay and
>> high rep-rate, if the sim is to be believed.
>> 
>> SAV541 is mostly specified as an RF part, but it's a dynamite switch.
>> 
>> I can post a link to the files if anybody wants to play with this. All
>> my values are first guesses, no math involved, and it works!
>> 
>> My SAV541 Spice model is a revision of Phil Hobbs' original.
>> Mini-Circuits is adamant that they will never provide Spice models, a
>> typical RF-bigot attitude.
>> 
> 
> With a low-resistance drain load like that, you don't care too much 
> about the low drain impedance of the pHEMT.  The old Avago ones were 
> around 160 ohms iirc.  The transconductance is high enough (400 

millimho or 
> something ridiculous like that) that you get gobs of voltage gain even so.
> 
> Really really crappy for followers though!
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Phil Hobbs
> 



-- 
Dr Philip C D Hobbs  Principal Consultant  ElectroOptical Innovations LLC /
Hobbs ElectroOptics  Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics