Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v23jor$15707$14@i2pn2.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic Subject: Re: Olcott is a Liar! Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 20:24:59 -0400 Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <v23jor$15707$14@i2pn2.org> References: <v18e32$1vbql$1@dont-email.me> <v1m1bf$lbo5$4@i2pn2.org> <v1m2hc$1ijhr$1@dont-email.me> <v1m31m$lbo4$1@i2pn2.org> <v1m4et$1iv85$1@dont-email.me> <v1m5co$lbo4$2@i2pn2.org> <v1m71h$1jnpi$1@dont-email.me> <v1m7mh$lbo5$5@i2pn2.org> <v1mb8f$1kgpl$1@dont-email.me> <v1mkf8$lbo5$7@i2pn2.org> <v1mkmm$1q5ee$1@dont-email.me> <v1na6f$1ugl0$1@dont-email.me> <v1o67n$24f4c$1@dont-email.me> <v1q1ie$2l40t$1@dont-email.me> <v1q9fp$qb0p$1@i2pn2.org> <v1qmq8$2prs6$1@dont-email.me> <v1qouc$2qb2s$1@dont-email.me> <v1vbpd$3gbc$1@dont-email.me> <v1vslr$7enr$1@dont-email.me> <v1vuor$24b2$1@news.muc.de> <v20027$865j$1@dont-email.me> <v200oo$843p$1@dont-email.me> <v200u2$8dd9$1@dont-email.me> <v202k0$8q16$1@dont-email.me> <v20654$9o07$1@dont-email.me> <v2086v$a4tr$1@dont-email.me> <v208db$a6jn$1@dont-email.me> <v20ak6$an12$1@dont-email.me> <v20b6v$akk9$1@dont-email.me> <v20cf4$11h4n$3@i2pn2.org> <v20ect$bki0$1@dont-email.me> <v21r2l$otc2$1@dont-email.me> <v22j90$u8vi$4@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 00:24:59 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="1219591"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg"; User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 In-Reply-To: <v22j90$u8vi$4@dont-email.me> Bytes: 3120 Lines: 48 On 5/15/24 11:10 AM, olcott wrote: > On 5/15/2024 3:17 AM, Mikko wrote: >> On 2024-05-14 19:34:52 +0000, olcott said: >> >>> *Anyone that says that I am wrong without knowing C is dishonest* >> >> First you should prove that you know C. > > Not at all. Not in the least. Deductive proofs cannot rely > on an argument from authority. > > Anyone that knows C and claims that I am wrong either provides > the required single valid counter-example proving that I am > wrong or meets the I did, and you LITERALLY are disregarding that truth. > > https://dictionary.findlaw.com/definition/reckless-disregard-of-the-truth.html > > of defamation cases. Maybe I should file suit. I suppose the problem is that since you don't have any positive reputation, your defamation doesn't really cause me damage. > >> For example, you should show >> that you can identify an error in the following code fragemnt: >> >> int H(ptr x, ptr x) // ptr is pointer to int function >> int D(ptr x) >> { >> int Halt_Status = H(x, x); >> if (Halt_Status) >> HERE: goto HERE; >> return Halt_Status; >> } >> >> int main() >> { >> H(D,D); >> } >> >> If you don't, nobody is going to believe that you know C. >> >