Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: sci.logic,comp.theory
Subject: Re: Olcott is a Liar!
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 20:25:03 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <v23jov$15707$15@i2pn2.org>
References: <v18e32$1vbql$1@dont-email.me> <v1m31m$lbo4$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v1m4et$1iv85$1@dont-email.me> <v1m5co$lbo4$2@i2pn2.org>
 <v1m71h$1jnpi$1@dont-email.me> <v1m7mh$lbo5$5@i2pn2.org>
 <v1mb8f$1kgpl$1@dont-email.me> <v1mkf8$lbo5$7@i2pn2.org>
 <v1mkmm$1q5ee$1@dont-email.me> <v1na6f$1ugl0$1@dont-email.me>
 <v1o67n$24f4c$1@dont-email.me> <v1q1ie$2l40t$1@dont-email.me>
 <v1q9fp$qb0p$1@i2pn2.org> <v1qmq8$2prs6$1@dont-email.me>
 <v1qouc$2qb2s$1@dont-email.me> <v1vbpd$3gbc$1@dont-email.me>
 <v1vslr$7enr$1@dont-email.me> <v1vuor$24b2$1@news.muc.de>
 <v20027$865j$1@dont-email.me> <v200oo$843p$1@dont-email.me>
 <v200u2$8dd9$1@dont-email.me> <v202k0$8q16$1@dont-email.me>
 <v20654$9o07$1@dont-email.me> <v2086v$a4tr$1@dont-email.me>
 <v208db$a6jn$1@dont-email.me> <v20ak6$an12$1@dont-email.me>
 <v20b6v$akk9$1@dont-email.me> <v20cf4$11h4n$3@i2pn2.org>
 <v20ect$bki0$1@dont-email.me> <v21r2l$otc2$1@dont-email.me>
 <v22j90$u8vi$4@dont-email.me> <v22ncp$14b7c$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v22pks$1006v$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 00:25:03 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1219591"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
In-Reply-To: <v22pks$1006v$3@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2777
Lines: 24

On 5/15/24 12:59 PM, olcott wrote:
> On 5/15/2024 11:20 AM, joes wrote:
>> Am Wed, 15 May 2024 10:10:24 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>>> On 5/15/2024 3:17 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>> On 2024-05-14 19:34:52 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>
>>>>> *Anyone that says that I am wrong without knowing C is dishonest*
>>>> First you should prove that you know C.
>>> Not at all. Not in the least. Deductive proofs cannot rely on an
>>> argument from authority.
>> Contradiction in three lines.
>>
>>> Anyone that knows C and claims that I am wrong either provides the
>>> required single valid counter-example proving that I am wrong or meets
>>> the [definition] of defamation cases.
>> Or doesn’t care.
>>
> 
> If the simply don't care they won't take a position
> against me. If the baselessly take a position against
> me THAT IS DEFAMATION !!!
> 
> 

No, YOU are committing defamation by your shameless disregard of the truth.