Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: cpu-x
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 03:50:03 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: the-candyden-of-code
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <v23vp9$1bu38$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v1b791$2ln8f$2@dont-email.me> <v1betu$2p8gq$1@dont-email.me>
 <66399f10$0$6551$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
 <v1f0m2$3ot7f$3@dont-email.me> <v1fr57$3urp9$3@dont-email.me>
 <v1jqfo$v3os$3@dont-email.me> <663fba6f$1$6436$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
 <v1rjs9$31trl$2@dont-email.me>
 <66420697$1$8482$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
 <v1u5l4$3nmqc$4@dont-email.me>
 <6643705f$1$2363137$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
 <v21a4n$lc8c$1@dont-email.me>
 <6644ae37$5$1258343$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
 <v23hna$15hep$2@dont-email.me>
 <66455eba$0$2363132$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
Injection-Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 05:50:04 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8c4495c5e035c396e24da933fa00ece3";
	logging-data="1439848"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+MwwX++lokQjMm6oCrWAiaTXxMyFV05AFakWf1/o0djg=="
User-Agent: slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:xLJVq3dbutWVPiIPf61T+CoiW4Y=
X-Face: b{dPmN&%4|lEo,wUO\"KLEOu5N_br(N2Yuc5/qcR5i>9-!^e\.Tw9?/m0}/~:UOM:Zf]%
 b+ V4R8q|QiU/R8\|G\WpC`-s?=)\fbtNc&=/a3a)r7xbRI]Vl)r<%PTriJ3pGpl_/B6!8pe\btzx
 `~R! r3.0#lHRE+^Gro0[cjsban'vZ#j7,?I/tHk{s=TFJ:H?~=]`O*~3ZX`qik`b:.gVIc-[$t/e
 ZrQsWJ >|l^I_[pbsIqwoz.WGA]<D
Bytes: 2819

Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote at 01:17 this Thursday (GMT):
> On Wed, 15 May 2024 23:50:04 +0000, candycanearter07 wrote:
>
>> Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote at 12:44 this Wednesday (GMT):
>>> On Wed, 15 May 2024 03:28:23 +0000, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>> [snip]
>>>> We do read open-source licences and understand them. They are designed
>>>> to be read and understood. Unlike proprietary EULAs.
>>>> 
>>>> Case in point: the question you were asking about below.
>>>
>>> That's definitely a good thing. The licenses are also shorter, so even
>>> if it were difficult to understand, reading it wouldn't take that much
>>> time.
>>>
>>>< snip >
>> 
>> 
>> And aren't updated as often.
>
> That's a good point. The licenses users of proprietary software might have 
> agreed to on day one will become so different by day three that the terms 
> might not be so agreeable. We've all received those e-mails from services 
> telling us that the terms have changed. Many of those terms have, in the 
> past few years, become increasingly restrictive.


Yeah.
-- 
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom