Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.bofh.team!paganini.bofh.team!not-for-mail
From: Paden Babansky <skn@aape.ru>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math
Subject: Re: Experiments on the validity of Relativity
Followup-To: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 21:43:34 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: To protect and to server
Message-ID: <v25um6$2o4lg$1@paganini.bofh.team>
References: <v1o6kk$24ib1$1@dont-email.me>
	<9_OcncyqLJldDdj7nZ2dnZfqlJ-dnZ2d@giganews.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 21:43:34 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: paganini.bofh.team; logging-data="2888368"; posting-host="xfwY5K8e1P8cSvzzsTFS2A.user.paganini.bofh.team"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@bofh.team"; posting-account="9dIQLXBM7WM9KzA+yjdR4A";
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.2 (Intel Mac OS X)
X-Face: "b|'<!l)?J8YU*Osv"h+xTcLY$qyB5ko604rE):,VwT97?})DLUxO|VEi{L(U|H$
 yha[XIH!0]u,m4A=uDN$MGeFt8V@jco'vv,Z~sz2&fsj]cUbOU)l.1p1-*;nj"b(L]G2Jc)
 |x.T:8V])-3O$0YRN->kp-LnjrZ>Cn.]0_!JO1[3*UdbuPI.!qfWKRs6VCG<1Q6MT<DLnbO !+
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.3
Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAElBMVEVsdonapqfc
 4exRKCELDxvk3cmFVRa9AAACSklEQVQ4jU2TS47rIBBFi2DPIU7NE/p5jhtnTgQ
 LMLRq/1t5Fxw7QfJHdbj1BSJlQvBVpM7VOSc6t5WItMUzOgCY3SxbCitAIFJcSO
 bdDoUMoUkCKSn0lMNeIWmKnCl4imM9QJOE0BUhhMS7oh6+Ug4d+FFEHBLrWCaET
 w3koORcyMvktLYYcOiLfC1UcoBF5AsNCL1mapU+2bLw216mD7BbCIedeMs5romG
 NUeUvumegQnel9aqQIjz2rhYq319BM91G4eclCVU85KHslYptviwKADLFNTwko0
 NG1uLsUij3KJWlRbeXtawXoyVoib/4DLxxo4WoqdtHiwAforlyXAVAI1W2WbqAH
 umxLOQ59uzlYUK67sBk+K5ki8Ijtb1BvYOyw1JOwpWxwrgOugT0ZYdgBkSO+wT3
 kEFqK6iDpMVtyAAvWHF87UpnrIGRrbNFSM4U2yTxGGwa7TWGCWuMJI2gxfXQMCE
 R3wIAO0f7bq4HXhMJWP8CPCHGZj14k7FkDCvsU3VrzpfPopMyuqlFG+NDqeizWp
 RSh7ouKHpBL7goHhLBv0zpKaQxh1cZ4CIyyA0N4/pHQNtaUBtZAi1WPjdAS5LP4
 yM0wB7O02/b9BOd46Enog17TbtBbq/yyO1u+URW7c7E71zDwDv7g3kc0XdFffYo
 38Bdbt2gBwof6/Lv5YWKbz0tz26nw7a62dNeT3Ar9sVLdDjW3Jxtw/w6RQg1w/4
 8WdSERnp6wGMMm9FapvjuyVuxutuYF09YfP9BPfrMeT+07N1/wFp89Oyh5qOrwA
 AAABJRU5ErkJggg==
Bytes: 3784
Lines: 21

Tom Roberts wrote:

> On 5/13/24 1:58 AM, Luigi Fortunati wrote:
>> When there is an experiment that proves Einstein right, the whole world
>> is ready to praise him and his theories (and rightly so). However, it
>> is not right that, when an experiment proves Einstein wrong, no one
>> admits it and no one talks about it.
> 
> This last is just plain wrong. Any REAL experiment that refuted either
> SR or GR would be GREAT NEWS and the experimenters would win praise and
> accolades. But they must be real experiments within the domain of
> applicability of the theory, and statistically inconsistent with its
> predictions. To date no such experiments have ever been published --
> your allegations here are just drivel: they are not real experiments,
> and they indicate that YOU do not understand General Relativity, because
> your claims are based upon a PUN on the word "acceleration".

this is incompleteness. I already proved Einstine inconsitent and a joke in science, hence physics, with my "On the Divergent Matter of the Moving Koerpers Model", where Gravity is about superpositioning the amplitude probability distribution, say Earth and another object whereever displace in space. Absolutely.

you can't expect bigger news in physics than that. The Einstine was terribly dumb in quantum mechanics, which explain he didn't undrestand the thing. The Einstine was absent at what is going on. I came to think on this illustration.

https://static-3.b%69%74%63%68%75te.com/live/cover_images/UnuX7D6YRyiE/KVAaoMRJiVVX_640x360.jpg