Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v26hgd$20265$5@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweak.nl!217.73.144.44.MISMATCH!feeder.ecngs.de!ecngs!feeder2.ecngs.de!168.119.53.7.MISMATCH!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: cpu-x Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 03:04:45 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 62 Message-ID: <v26hgd$20265$5@dont-email.me> References: <v1b791$2ln8f$2@dont-email.me> <v1betu$2p8gq$1@dont-email.me> <66399f10$0$6551$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <v1f0m2$3ot7f$3@dont-email.me> <v1fr57$3urp9$3@dont-email.me> <v1jqfo$v3os$3@dont-email.me> <663fba6f$1$6436$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <66400e83$0$7173$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <v1rjq7$31trl$1@dont-email.me> <66420423$0$6444$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <v1u5nc$3nmqc$5@dont-email.me> <6642ac1f$0$3711206$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <v22fdi$tjac$2@dont-email.me> <6644ffb2$0$3711201$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 05:04:45 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f8a78acc5556ddf54860c465c23cc49e"; logging-data="2099397"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19cITwF3zArTWWEMO6t2XXr" User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:4fPlmQSssoFcekwJ7H4Ivj7i1lw= Bytes: 4746 On 2024-05-15, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote: > On Wed, 15 May 2024 14:04:34 +0000, RonB wrote: > >> On 2024-05-14, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote: >>> On Mon, 13 May 2024 22:54:36 +0000, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >>> >>>> On 13 May 2024 12:14:27 GMT, Andrzej Matuch wrote: >>>> >>>>> ... explain how it is the _software_ that is making them money, >>>>> and not the _support_ for that software. >>>> >>>> It is the support that is making the money. That is the point, after >>>> all. >>>> >>>> Ever heard of “give away the razor, sell the razorblades”? That’s how >>>> Free Software works. >>> >>> So, it would be beneficial to open-source developers to make sure that >>> their software breaks easily and crashes, so as to sell the support. >>> Gotcha. >> >> Yeah, that would be brilliant, because customers would flock by the >> droves to useless, crap software... But you may have something, people >> keep using crap Microsoft Windows even though their "customers" are >> really Microsoft's unpaid beta testers. > > They use Windows because it's what they got on the computer they purchased > which cost less than a similar Mac. Considering how Windows can run on > just about any hardware and support every third-party peripheral they plug > into it, they are not likely to seek out an alternative, even if it > crashes a few times. It also has the largest library of software, and tons > of experts can be found on the web to help them with any technical problem > they have, free of charge. Those are real benefits, no matter how much one > hates Windows. I find a lot better support for Linux on the Internet than I do for Windows. There are a LOT of people who'll tell you how to fix Windows... only problem is, none of it EVER works. When my wife's old computer BSOD'd (twice during upgrades) I found (and tried) about 20 "solutions," none of which worked. The second time I went to what actually worked sooner — using a Linux Live[B USB to download her data and rebuild the computer from scratch. I could be a great Windows support expert... I've already memorized the three Rs, "Reboot. Reboot. Rebuild." (Again this is from a years back and I will admit that wife has had a lot less trouble since then. Although I still have to reset her network something or other when it slows to crawl on the Internet (what is that crap?). And I still think Windows is the most convoluted crap OS ever made. > Linux has much of the above too, but its library of software isn't as > impressive and the software's general quality isn't there either. It works > on anything, that's true, but not anyone is comfortable with the process > of installing it, no matter how easy it is. I understand. I've known people who buy a new Windows computer every time the old one slows down because that's all they want to know. "Doesn't work right any more, but a new one." -- [Self-centered, Woke] "pride is a life of self-destructive fakery, an entrapment to a false and self-created matrix of twisted unreality." "It was pride that changed angels into devils..." — St. Augustine