Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v278pt$24k9i$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: Is Richard a Liar? Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 12:42:21 +0300 Organization: - Lines: 47 Message-ID: <v278pt$24k9i$1@dont-email.me> References: <v18e32$1vbql$1@dont-email.me> <v1m2hc$1ijhr$1@dont-email.me> <v1m31m$lbo4$1@i2pn2.org> <v1m4et$1iv85$1@dont-email.me> <v1m5co$lbo4$2@i2pn2.org> <v1m71h$1jnpi$1@dont-email.me> <v1m7mh$lbo5$5@i2pn2.org> <v1mb8f$1kgpl$1@dont-email.me> <v1mkf8$lbo5$7@i2pn2.org> <v1mkmm$1q5ee$1@dont-email.me> <v1na6f$1ugl0$1@dont-email.me> <v1o67n$24f4c$1@dont-email.me> <v1q1ie$2l40t$1@dont-email.me> <v1q9fp$qb0p$1@i2pn2.org> <v1qmq8$2prs6$1@dont-email.me> <v1qouc$2qb2s$1@dont-email.me> <v1vbpd$3gbc$1@dont-email.me> <v1vslr$7enr$1@dont-email.me> <v1vuor$24b2$1@news.muc.de> <v20027$865j$1@dont-email.me> <v200oo$843p$1@dont-email.me> <v200u2$8dd9$1@dont-email.me> <v202k0$8q16$1@dont-email.me> <v20654$9o07$1@dont-email.me> <v2086v$a4tr$1@dont-email.me> <v208db$a6jn$1@dont-email.me> <v20ak6$an12$1@dont-email.me> <v20b6v$akk9$1@dont-email.me> <v20cf4$11h4n$3@i2pn2.org> <v20ect$bki0$1@dont-email.me> <v21r2l$otc2$1@dont-email.me> <v22j90$u8vi$4@dont-email.me> <v2592p$1kspo$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 11:42:22 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="dbf1b225f2871bff3da7815f4eb7b472"; logging-data="2249010"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX199x5avu+LEyJ1jgW2GCB/v" User-Agent: Unison/2.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:u0GE5cE8BI0hw/mk3OtzVrZdv8w= Bytes: 3651 On 2024-05-16 15:34:48 +0000, olcott said: > On 5/16/2024 4:14 AM, Mikko wrote: >> On 2024-05-15 15:10:24 +0000, olcott said: >> >>> On 5/15/2024 3:17 AM, Mikko wrote: >>>> On 2024-05-14 19:34:52 +0000, olcott said: >>>> >>>>> *Anyone that says that I am wrong without knowing C is dishonest* >>>> >>>> First you should prove that you know C. >>> >>> Not at all. Not in the least. Deductive proofs cannot rely >>> on an argument from authority. >> >> True but irrelevant. When someone sayes you are wrong, that does not >> refer to any deductive proofs as you haven't presented deductive >> proofs. > > None-the-less a single-valid-counter-example would prove that > I am wrong thus any claim that I am wrong lacking this required > valid counter-example is empty rhetoric entirely bereft of any > supporting reasoning: (EREBOASR). That would be one way to prove that you are wrong but any other proof is equally sufficient. Often a proof without a counter example is shorter or clearer and therefore preferred. Of course the way to prove depends on the nature of the particular one of your errors one wants to point out. No proof is needed if the error is sufficiently obvious (or thought to be), for in those cases the error alone is a sufficient proof. In any case, if there is no proof or the proof is not clear enough you can always ask for a clarification. > Repeatedly claiming that I am wrong without providing the required > counter-example when this counter-example is repeatedly requested > (and categorically impossible) does meet the standard of a reckless > disregard for the truth. No, it does not. A different kind of proof is sufficient to meet the standard, and even a good justification of another kind. -- Mikko