Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v27d5n$25h9l$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ###
Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 13:56:55 +0300
Organization: -
Lines: 60
Message-ID: <v27d5n$25h9l$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v18e32$1vbql$1@dont-email.me> <v1avuv$2lks2$1@dont-email.me> <v1b7gl$2ndka$1@dont-email.me> <v1cla9$34iis$1@dont-email.me> <v1d2mi$9f72$11@i2pn2.org> <v1di1h$3b2m5$1@dont-email.me> <v1dtdv$3dqg4$1@dont-email.me> <v1du2i$3dt7u$1@dont-email.me> <v1fetd$3s7jo$1@dont-email.me> <v1ft42$3vdau$2@dont-email.me> <-5Gdnf-nQvstC6b7nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> <v1gid8$4ilc$1@dont-email.me> <v1h9eu$9faf$1@dont-email.me> <v1iqli$nsva$1@dont-email.me> <v1ln3c$vfh$1@news.muc.de> <v1s6e6$397iq$2@dont-email.me> <v1slmi$3cjtp$1@dont-email.me> <v1t8tt$3gu9t$3@dont-email.me> <v1vc8j$3jmr$1@dont-email.me> <v1vsru$7eqc$1@dont-email.me> <v21r4i$otc2$2@dont-email.me> <v22k4b$umr4$1@dont-email.me> <v24oah$1h4u3$1@dont-email.me> <v256fc$1kais$1@dont-email.me> <v25bf0$ecc$1@news.muc.de> <v25crp$1lmq1$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 12:56:56 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="dbf1b225f2871bff3da7815f4eb7b472";
	logging-data="2278709"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/ZD9AsTMWTwzBKjiXTBbCC"
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:bZzQKXm6usCaOiaRP2HYDceFvLo=
Bytes: 3585

On 2024-05-16 16:39:20 +0000, olcott said:

> On 5/16/2024 11:15 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>> olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 5/16/2024 5:48 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>> On 2024-05-15 15:24:57 +0000, olcott said:
>> 
>> [ .... ]
>> 
>>>> Normal semantics is that the program is not executed.
>> 
>> Indeed.
>> 
>>>>> typedef int (*ptr)();  // ptr is pointer to int function
>>>>> 00 int H(ptr x, ptr x);
>>>>> 01 int D(ptr x)
>>>>> 02 {
>>>>> 03   int Halt_Status = H(x, x);
>>>>> 04   if (Halt_Status)
>>>>> 05     HERE: goto HERE;
>>>>> 06   return Halt_Status;
>>>>> 07 }
>>>>> 08
>>>>> 09 int main()
>>>>> 10 {
>>>>> 11   H(D,D);
>>>>> 12   return 0;
>>>>> 13 }
>> 
>>>> Can you find any compiler that is liberal enough to accept that?
>> 
>>> It has been fully operational code under Windows and
>>> Linux for two years.
>> 
>> That is another of your lies.  It's largely why I despise you so much.
>> 
>> Although you've fixed the missing semicolon on line 0 (at last), it still
>> fails to compile under any C compiler worthy of the name.  With all the
>> errors in it it still would have failed to compile under Linux or Windows
>> ever since it was written.
>> 
>> Quit lying.  And fix that program fragment, assuming your C skills are up
>> to it.
> 
> There are many postings in this group providing the
> actual execution trace output of that program.
> It was named H and had input P,P back in 2021.
> 
> The record shows that you responded to these posts
> that had the actual execution trace output provided.
> 
> My code fragment is a program template. I have told you this
> countless times and you simply ignore what I say.

If you want to talk about the program before or istead of correcting the
errors, do so in comp.lang.c but not here.

-- 
Mikko