Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v2803l$2941f$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!npeer.as286.net!npeer-ng0.as286.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone Subject: Re: What if somebody made an iphone iOS emulator that actually works? Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 09:20:05 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 28 Message-ID: <v2803l$2941f$2@dont-email.me> References: <pq6cnTwBnrQkCtv7nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 18:20:05 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1b18672eb144ea96f0dd9299ea96279d"; logging-data="2396207"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19wV2t86loRc1VdqSNfbxzcuIs9FCHjWWo=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:jJCNHy5JGDDUVda8ZYjm0tbe5uc= Content-Language: en-CA In-Reply-To: <pq6cnTwBnrQkCtv7nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com> Bytes: 2182 On 2024-05-16 16:33, Danart wrote: > So in the past an iphone emulator was made in Adobe Air. Air is a > programming environment similar to flash and director and more > recently associates with HTML5. This was spot on in emulating the > original iphone. You need to learn the difference between "emulation" and "simulation". > > The only problem with iphone emulation is that while it is linux the > licensing via Apple products ( which is the real reason why Apple > prefers you not to have one ). iOS is NOT Linux. > > Tons of applications in the iOS environment could actually be > utilized. I would not mind to have one of my own as I use Android on a > regular basis. > > Now your going to say "what about the hardware" ? Well the > hardware of the iphone is not so different from the android > counter-parts. So something like a Goolge-Pixel or even Samsung Galaxy > models would probably do justice. > > Again unless you like purchasing only Apple devices for some reason? >