Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v28n3h$2dlvs$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone Subject: Re: What if somebody made an iphone iOS emulator that actually works? Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 15:52:33 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 31 Message-ID: <v28n3h$2dlvs$1@dont-email.me> References: <v28apr$2b9h8$1@dont-email.me> <v28ljg$2dcv5$1@dont-email.me> <v28ltv$2ddn9$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 18 May 2024 00:52:34 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e66aea8544f7dd023975bae1b6ad7b78"; logging-data="2545660"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX192TBurTVqB79LcDmq66/yH58gGLCwUfsw=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:tfdG8zyJHhytaSArg+wCRyttLAs= In-Reply-To: <v28ltv$2ddn9$1@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-CA Bytes: 2050 On 2024-05-17 15:32, Hank Rogers wrote: > Your Name wrote: >> On 2024-05-17 19:22:35 +0000, Cameo said: >>> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>> On 2024-05-16 16:33, Danart wrote: >>>>> So in the past an iphone emulator was made in Adobe Air. Air is a >>>>> programming environment similar to flash and director and more >>>>> recently associates with HTML5. This was spot on in emulating the >>>>> original iphone. >>>> >>>> You need to learn the difference between "emulation" and "simulation". >>>> >>>>> The only problem with iphone emulation is that while it is linux the >>>>> licensing via Apple products ( which is the real reason why Apple >>>>> prefers you not to have one ). >>>> >>>> iOS is NOT Linux. >>>> >>> Is it still a Berkeley Linux derivative? >> >> All of Apple's operating systems are based on Unix (Mach microkernel >> and FreeBSD) ... not Linux. >> > > Even the 2E? > > You're really... ....not very clever.