Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v28uvk$1a3tk$9@i2pn2.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!npeer.as286.net!npeer-ng0.as286.net!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic Subject: Re: Olcott is a Liar! Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 21:07:00 -0400 Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <v28uvk$1a3tk$9@i2pn2.org> References: <v18e32$1vbql$1@dont-email.me> <v1vslr$7enr$1@dont-email.me> <v1vuor$24b2$1@news.muc.de> <v20027$865j$1@dont-email.me> <v200oo$843p$1@dont-email.me> <v200u2$8dd9$1@dont-email.me> <v202k0$8q16$1@dont-email.me> <v20654$9o07$1@dont-email.me> <v2086v$a4tr$1@dont-email.me> <v208db$a6jn$1@dont-email.me> <v20ak6$an12$1@dont-email.me> <v20b6v$akk9$1@dont-email.me> <v20eg6$bn7u$1@dont-email.me> <v20eqg$bki0$2@dont-email.me> <v20g5p$c1lu$1@dont-email.me> <v20gld$c8gh$1@dont-email.me> <v21k9m$nao2$1@dont-email.me> <v22f9e$tjgs$1@dont-email.me> <v22i3t$u5vc$1@dont-email.me> <v22nq4$ven4$1@dont-email.me> <v22uc5$10vef$1@dont-email.me> <v22vh7$11dig$2@dont-email.me> <v231gd$11ppa$1@dont-email.me> <v234r2$12odu$1@dont-email.me> <v24njh$1gvck$2@dont-email.me> <v256n5$1kais$2@dont-email.me> <v257o1$1kd2t$1@dont-email.me> <v25aqg$1l575$2@dont-email.me> <v25krf$1nb8s$1@dont-email.me> <v25n16$1nr9a$1@dont-email.me> <v274bc$23knp$1@dont-email.me> <v27tkr$28hmg$5@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 18 May 2024 01:07:00 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="1380276"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg"; User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 In-Reply-To: <v27tkr$28hmg$5@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2621 Lines: 19 On 5/17/24 11:38 AM, olcott wrote: > > *I will update my words to say this* > It is self-evidently true to anyone having sufficient knowledge > of the semantics of the C programming language. > Which, since I posted over two weeks ago how to do it in C, means that you don't have the needed knowledge of the C programming language, or about what truth actually is. And the fact that you refuse to take up any of my challenges to have me repost the link (because you clearly prefer to just lie rather that try to do some research) it is clear that you are not actually certain of your claim, so you know you may be lying, but you do it anyway. And you are proven to just be an ignorant damned pathological liar.