Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: No Message-ID therefore construed as Liar
Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 23:05:59 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 38
Message-ID: <v299f7$2k9r2$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v18e32$1vbql$1@dont-email.me> <v1vuor$24b2$1@news.muc.de>
 <v20027$865j$1@dont-email.me> <v200oo$843p$1@dont-email.me>
 <v200u2$8dd9$1@dont-email.me> <v202k0$8q16$1@dont-email.me>
 <v20654$9o07$1@dont-email.me> <v2086v$a4tr$1@dont-email.me>
 <v208db$a6jn$1@dont-email.me> <v20ak6$an12$1@dont-email.me>
 <v20b6v$akk9$1@dont-email.me> <v20eg6$bn7u$1@dont-email.me>
 <v20eqg$bki0$2@dont-email.me> <v20g5p$c1lu$1@dont-email.me>
 <v20gld$c8gh$1@dont-email.me> <v21k9m$nao2$1@dont-email.me>
 <v22f9e$tjgs$1@dont-email.me> <v22i3t$u5vc$1@dont-email.me>
 <v22nq4$ven4$1@dont-email.me> <v22uc5$10vef$1@dont-email.me>
 <v22vh7$11dig$2@dont-email.me> <v231gd$11ppa$1@dont-email.me>
 <v234r2$12odu$1@dont-email.me> <v24njh$1gvck$2@dont-email.me>
 <v256n5$1kais$2@dont-email.me> <v257o1$1kd2t$1@dont-email.me>
 <v25aqg$1l575$2@dont-email.me> <v25krf$1nb8s$1@dont-email.me>
 <v25n16$1nr9a$1@dont-email.me> <v271ms$2339e$1@dont-email.me>
 <v27t7q$28hmg$3@dont-email.me> <v28v0g$1a3tk$15@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 18 May 2024 06:06:00 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="95afb1fc0a4871125108def5044e156a";
	logging-data="2762594"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19YH0SmyM5ktJ2IyAS0bD/s"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:s+qdMTb9LqTiV3QnXJPWhi0MO3A=
In-Reply-To: <v28v0g$1a3tk$15@i2pn2.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3430

On 5/17/2024 8:07 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 5/17/24 11:31 AM, olcott wrote:
>> On 5/17/2024 2:41 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
> 
>>> Again no proof. Now the excuse is that it is self-evidently true. A 
>>> bad excuse, because it is self-evident only for olcott. That is what 
>>> we call belief. It shows again that when olcott writes 'verified 
>>> fact' we should read 'my belief'. Sorry, olcott, but with only your 
>>> belief, your are not going to invalidate a proven theorem in 
>>> computation theory. You will convince nobody if no proof can be 
>>> supplied.
>>
>> It is self-evidently true to anyone having sufficient knowledge
>> of the semantics of the C programming language.
>>
>>
> 
> 
> Which, since I posted over two weeks ago how to do it in C, means that 
> you don't have the needed knowledge of the C programming language, or 
> about what truth actually is.
> 
> And the fact that you refuse to take up any of my challenges to have me 
> repost the link 

I told you to post the Message ID or be construed as a liar and
you chose the latter so I ignore all of your posts besides one.

> (because you clearly prefer to just lie rather that try 
> to do some research) it is clear that you are not actually certain of 
> your claim, so you know you may be lying, but you do it anyway.
> 
> 

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer