Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: [OT] Professor inflitrates pro-Palestinian encampment; union
 leader calls for consequences
Date: Sat, 18 May 2024 05:19:20 -0400
Organization: Ph'nglui Mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh Wgah'nagl Fhtagn.
Lines: 104
Message-ID: <v29rqo$2nep1$2@dont-email.me>
References: <20240505204412.000020d9@example.com>
 <v1lpp9$1gnv5$1@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-C514B8.15165012052024@news.giganews.com>
 <v1rhbi$31ea6$1@dont-email.me>
 <pAadnbLSD9TW19z7nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <v1rtuq$37l07$1@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-F73D18.19593612052024@news.giganews.com>
 <v1tb17$3hi6h$1@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-FDC779.10472413052024@news.giganews.com>
 <v1tp0v$3krav$1@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-859A07.13351913052024@news.giganews.com>
 <v1u2bf$3n232$1@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-ACE9E8.15333813052024@news.giganews.com>
 <17cf4e57e89874c7$22472$310004$2d54864@news.newsdemon.com>
Reply-To: fredp1571@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 18 May 2024 11:19:21 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f3602241149d2c4ff8814e0c23f7ec19";
	logging-data="2865953"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+UY3nTDxMPLmbqL4hpGiqV"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:78.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:lbyNjFsVmGQHzQxt9+Vhn267BIs=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <17cf4e57e89874c7$22472$310004$2d54864@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 5913

On 5/14/24 4:42 AM, trotsky wrote:
> On 5/13/24 5:33 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> In article <v1u2bf$3n232$1@dont-email.me>,
>>   moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 5/13/2024 4:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>> In article <v1tp0v$3krav$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>    moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 5/13/2024 1:47 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>> In article <v1tb17$3hi6h$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>     moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 5/12/2024 10:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>> In article <v1rtuq$37l07$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>      moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 5/12/2024 7:01 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On May 12, 2024 at 3:54:42 PM PDT, "moviePig" 
>>>>>>>>>> <nobody@nowhere.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/12/2024 6:16 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>       In article <v1lpp9$1gnv5$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>         moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>       On 5/10/2024 1:56 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And now the Scarf Lady, Dr. Deborah Birx, says that 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thousands of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Americans could be injured from the mRNA Wuhan Flu shot 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some groups should not have been forced to get the jab.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Weird how she wasn't saying that when Biden's decree was 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "take the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shot or you're fired" in the federal government. Back 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then, she
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and your vaunted 'fact checkers' would only repeat the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mantra that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's 'safe and effective'.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You mean it *shouldn't* have been called safe and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> effective?...
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ask the people who were injured from the jab whether they 
>>>>>>>>>>>> think the
>>>>>>>>>>>> government should have told them it was safe.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm asking what a responsible public health official ought to 
>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>> said.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> How about the truth?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The truth is that every medical procedure *including NO procedure*
>>>>>>>>> carries some risk.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And an ethical medical professional explains the type and extent 
>>>>>>>> of that
>>>>>>>> risk, as well as its frequency of occurrence in the population.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> They don't ignore the risk and just tell you "it's safe and 
>>>>>>>> effective".
>>>>>>>> (And don't forget the denigration and censorship of anyone who 
>>>>>>>> suggested
>>>>>>>> otherwise, who have yet again turned out to be right in the end.)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> People who know there's always a small risk don't need to be 
>>>>>>> told. And
>>>>>>> people who *don't* know it will grossly overreact when they *are* 
>>>>>>> told.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So once again, it's okay for the government to lie to us for our own
>>>>>> good.
>>>>>>> So, the public at large heard "safe and effective", which, in 
>>>>>>> context,
>>>>>>> the vaccine very much was. Meanwhile, one needn't support 
>>>>>>> censorship to
>>>>>>> strongly disapprove of sensationalist life-threatening 
>>>>>>> disinformation.
>>>>>
>>>>> Once again, real-world decisions appear simplest to those who don't 
>>>>> have
>>>>> to make them. But happily, in this instance, the vaccine *was* safe.
>>>>
>>>> Except for the people who were injured by it.
>>>
>>> This just in:  Don't risk getting out of bed tomorrow...
>>
>> This just in: People have a right to know all the risks of drugs they're
>> not just being asked to take, but ordered to take under threat of loss
>> of their livelihood.
> 
> 
> A couple of things: a) you misspelled "livelihoods"...

He's been on a typo tear, lately.  I think he's sundowning...


-- 
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC 
Bible  25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0