Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v2bhgr$31fpt$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android
Subject: Re: Steps counting apps - and finally
Date: Sun, 19 May 2024 00:35:39 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 39
Message-ID: <v2bhgr$31fpt$1@dont-email.me>
References: <MPG.40afe58775b3726f989713@paganini.bofh.team>
 <v9chhkxloa.ln2@Telcontar.valinor>
 <v254f7$1jmiv$1@dont-email.me>
 <MPG.40b02e159292c1df989715@paganini.bofh.team>
 <v25edi$1m1sd$1@dont-email.me>
 <MPG.40b1a8ed4237288e989717@paganini.bofh.team>
 <v28ca9$6uc$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <MPG.40b1d2772aff18a8989718@paganini.bofh.team>
 <v28god$182a$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <v28h08$22t1$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <MPG.40b1fedc97371c20989719@paganini.bofh.team>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 19 May 2024 02:35:40 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="86693d046eb6abfd113c48f390173203";
	logging-data="3194685"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+co0OYYi8+oimXXp/2bTkegYoeycpFwAA="
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:cWJ6pWL6EgwE3artFUrv4QajIWo=
	sha1:ZZmpvAzOWfEhWRVZlz9/guLjq+s=
Bytes: 3333

Jim the Geordie <jim@jimXscott.co.uk> wrote:
> In article <v28h08$22t1$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>, 
> andrew@spam.net says...
>> 
>> Andrew wrote on Fri, 17 May 2024 21:04:14 -0000 (UTC) :
>> 
>>> What you might want to do given you tested a number of apps is find the
>>> average, and then select and app that you like that was close to the mean.
>> 
>> Or.... since the average could still be incorrect, what you might want to
>> do (although tedious) is literally *count* your steps (yes, tedious).
>> 
>> And then you'd know which one is correct as otherwise you're stuck with the
>> old adage about knowing the time when you have two clocks in front of you.
>> 
>> One perhaps slightly less tedious way to count the steps is to measure your
>> stride, and then find a flat area to walk a given decent distance at as
>> much of the same stride as you can facilitate. Then do the simple math.
>> 
>> Whichever app is closest to your control, would be the most accurate
>> (at least for flat land with even strides).
> 
> Thanks Andrew.
> It all started with an argument between two friends in the pub.
> Neither of them will have thought about stride length or whether they 
> were burning calories. They probably read somewhere that taking 'x' 
> strides a day would go towards living for ever and yah boo sucks I do 
> more strides than you.
> My quick check suggests they are talking tosh, not only about what other 
> things go on with their life, but they are comparing apples with oranges 
> and it all baloney.
> But how many others believe they are saved by an app of dubious 
> validity.
> Perhaps they shouldn't be in the pub if they want to live longer.

The step count isn't useful as an absolute measure, but moreso as a
relative measure. It's more useful to see whether you're doing 50% more
steps this month when compared to last month.