Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?
Date: Sun, 19 May 2024 14:00:15 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 59
Message-ID: <v2di7v$3gujt$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v2b78t$2vima$1@dont-email.me>
 <v2df79$3ghfd$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 19 May 2024 21:00:15 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8b2dd23db76027a1e88bd64b7a96c771";
	logging-data="3701373"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/5hwXI0t406OAWSlB2dpum"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:lzk7t4RWOvBfIfBC6xmEuX+86zA=
In-Reply-To: <v2df79$3ghfd$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2986

On 5/19/2024 1:08 PM, Bonita Montero wrote:
> Am 18.05.2024 um 23:40 schrieb olcott:
>> People are saying that they have no idea what this code does
>> because they do not believe it conforms to c11 or c17.
>>
>> typedef int (*ptr)();  // ptr is pointer to int function
>> 00 int H(ptr x, ptr y);
>> 01 int D(ptr x)
>> 02 {
>> 03   int Halt_Status = H(x, x);
>> 04   if (Halt_Status)
>> 05     HERE: goto HERE;
>> 06   return Halt_Status;
>> 07 }
>> 08
>> 09 int main()
>> 10 {
>> 11   H(D,D);
>> 12   return 0;
>> 13 }
>>
>> In the above case a simulator is an x86 emulator that correctly emulates
>> at least one of the x86 instructions of D in the order specified by the
>> x86 instructions of D.
>>
>> This may include correctly emulating the x86 instructions of H in the
>> order specified by the x86 instructions of H thus calling H(D,D) in
>> recursive simulation.
>>
>> *Execution Trace*
>> Line 11: main() invokes H(D,D);
>>
>> *keeps repeating* (unless aborted)
>> Line 01:
>> Line 02:
>> Line 03: simulated D(D) invokes simulated H(D,D) that simulates D(D)
>>
>> *Simulation invariant*
>> D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own line 03.
>>
>> The key thing to note is that no D correctly simulated by any H of every
>> H/D pair specified by the above template ever reaches its own line 06
>> and halts.
>>
> 
> Other people think 30s about this, you think years about that.
> 

It is the basis for my two decades long primary research into 
termination analysis. People on another forum have written
hundreds of posts claiming that D correctly simulated by H
reaches its own line 06 and halts.

*I have only gotten truthful answers on this forum*

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer