Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: immibis <news@immibis.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally? --- Message_ID Provided
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 10:37:55 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <v2f254$3t604$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v0k4jc$laej$1@dont-email.me> <v0m37e$2gl1e$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v0m3v5$16k3h$1@dont-email.me> <v0m55t$2gl1f$3@i2pn2.org>
 <v0m5sn$172p4$1@dont-email.me> <v0m7em$2gl1f$5@i2pn2.org>
 <v0m7tq$17dpv$1@dont-email.me> <v0m8g9$2gl1e$6@i2pn2.org>
 <v0m978$17k7o$3@dont-email.me> <v0mko6$2hf3s$2@i2pn2.org>
 <v0n59h$1h98e$1@dont-email.me> <v0o037$2j1tu$3@i2pn2.org>
 <v0oc65$1q3aq$3@dont-email.me> <v0p9ts$2ki5r$6@i2pn2.org>
 <v0q1rk$2a3u1$1@dont-email.me> <v0qkti$2m1nf$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v0r4a3$2hb7o$6@dont-email.me> <v0rsbr$2m1nf$6@i2pn2.org>
 <v0segm$2v4oq$1@dont-email.me> <v0t8o9$2p3ri$2@i2pn2.org>
 <v0tpjf$3881i$5@dont-email.me> <v0ulma$2qov4$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v2b179$2u8oi$2@dont-email.me> <v2b1g3$1ct7p$17@i2pn2.org>
 <v2bb0g$308qd$1@dont-email.me> <v2bc8u$1ecj9$4@i2pn2.org>
 <v2bdaj$30o5r$1@dont-email.me> <v2be6g$1ecja$2@i2pn2.org>
 <v2btfr$36vvc$3@dont-email.me> <v2cqii$3cek2$2@dont-email.me>
 <v2cthk$3d018$1@dont-email.me> <v2ek1t$3qnl3$1@dont-email.me>
 <v2emdh$3r3vn$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 10:37:56 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="fa921e7d3e9411b357ff99fb26c1b6c6";
	logging-data="4102148"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/5AuQeS80/HvjwJ5Hx3P6x"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:A4nD7PiIUtekuRR8dTJplsliO8c=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v2emdh$3r3vn$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 3062

On 20/05/24 07:17, olcott wrote:
> On 5/19/2024 11:37 PM, immibis wrote:
>> On 19/05/24 15:06, olcott wrote:
>>> Show H simulating P and H simulating itself simulating P.
>>>
>>> The 395 pages of the execution trace of the simulated H are
>>> screened out. No one here could ever understand the half page
>>> trace so embedding that in 395 more pages would not help.
>>
>> The fact that you took 395 pages to get to "if(flag) return 0;" does 
>> not mean that you didn't use "if(flag) return 0;"
>>
>>>
>>> That P is simulated correctly is proven by the fact that the
>>> x86 assembly language instructions of P are correctly simulated
>>> and they are simulated in the order that the assembly language
>>> of P specifies.
>>
>> This is a lie -> If every assembly instruction that was simulated is 
>> simulated correctly, the program was simulated correctly. <- This is a 
>> lie.
>>
> 
> *Quoted from page 4 of the paper linked below*

Notice that none of what you wrote had any relationship to anything that 
I wrote.