Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Stormy Daniels Gave "Disastrous" Testimony In Trump Trial, CNN
 Legal Analyst Says
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 09:33:32 -0400
Organization: Ph'nglui Mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh Wgah'nagl Fhtagn.
Lines: 99
Message-ID: <v2fjfc$jvs$2@dont-email.me>
References: <Ubt146$3dvu1$17@dont-email.me>
 <ufi64j9p5th7nmr25dk6q4in75v8bohjjf@4ax.com> <v1vrvv$9d31$1@solani.org>
 <v200c2$89tl$1@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-87B68A.09430014052024@news.giganews.com>
 <v29nhl$2mmaj$1@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-A68862.11224218052024@news.giganews.com>
Reply-To: fredp1571@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 15:33:33 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="def5f5aa8775bccfb70591c7123d1c80";
	logging-data="20476"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19UjOSDh+ZXtYgI1iCL8lWN"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:78.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:M1/569mHWJ9ZHPkjz3YsP8H9C9U=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <atropos-A68862.11224218052024@news.giganews.com>
Bytes: 5550

On 5/18/24 2:22 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <v29nhl$2mmaj$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> On 5/14/24 12:43 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article <v200c2$89tl$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>    "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Crosspost to newsgroups Ubi doesn't read cut
>>>>
>>>> suzeeq <suzeeq@imbris.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 5/14/2024 4:25 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>> Sun, 12 May 2024 04:30:46 -0400, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The article that Ubi the shithead plagarized is this:
>>>>
>>>> Stormy Daniels Gave 'Disastrous' Testimony In Trump Trial, CNN Legal
>>>> Analyst Says
>>>> By Daniel Chaitin
>>>> The Daily Wire
>>>> May 8, 2024
>>>> https://www.dailywire.com/news/stormy-daniels-gave-disastrous-testimony-in-
>>>> tru
>>>> mp-trial-cnn-legal-analyst-says
>>>>
>>>>>>> . . .
>>>>
>>>>>> The prosecutors have yet to produce ANY evidence that Trump committed
>>>>>> any crime.
>>>>
>>>>> He's charged with covering up payments to her for killing her story to
>>>>> interfere with his 2016 campaign. That's the crime and they have proved
>>>>> it with other witnesses.
>>>>
>>>> Just a moment. You need to explain this in full.
>>>>
>>>> She was looking for a payout. She approached people close to Trump
>>>> seeking money and wanted to speed the process along by threating to sell
>>>> her story to someone else if she didn't receive her payout.
>>>>
>>>> That's extortion. No one has yet explained why her actions couldn't have
>>>> been prosecuted under state law.
>>>>
>>>> Trump's first instinct was to treat her like he treated subcontractors
>>>> on developments: Stall the payment or not pay at all. At first he wanted
>>>> to wait till after the election, for if he lost, nothing she was selling
>>>> would be of value. He was advised to spend the money to make problem go
>>>> away.
>>>>
>>>> None of this is criminal.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not even sure if paying extortion is a criminal act on the part of
>>>> the victim.
>>>>
>>>> The payment to her was a crime, not because buying rights so she won't
>>>> publish what she claimed was her story is a crime, but because keeping
>>>> it from being published was of some benefit to Trump as a candidate and
>>>> it wasn't disclosed as required in federal law.
>>>
>>> If that's the standard, then Democrats have all broken that law by not
>>> disclosing MSNBC and CNN, which are a lot more than just some benefit to
>>> Democrats as candidates.
>>>
>>>> What Trump is being prosecuted for is ordering that the payment to
>>>> reimburse Cohen be written from one of the companies Trump controlled
>>>> and taken as a business expense of that company.
>>>
>>> They're saying it boils down to Trump notating the payment to Cohen as
>>> "legal expenses", which is falsifying a business record. This in a city
>>> that's a violent hellhole...
>>
>> <MAGA Bullshit snipped>
> 
> Inconvenient evidence of Bragg's prosecutorial hypocrisy snipped for
> advantage by Effa restored:
> 
>> where thugs are making a sport out of walking up to random women and
>> punching them so hard, the bones in their faces are shattered. And when
>> caught, they're released on no bail almost immediately. Alvin Bragg won't
>> aggressively prosecute *that* but Trump putting a vague term in the memo
>> line on a check to Cohen is apparently worth spending millions of dollars
>> of prosecution resources.
>>
>> But don't say this is weaponizing the courts against political
>> opponents. That means you're a conspiracy theorist!
>>
>> Trump should have just written "reimbursement" on the memo line. That
>> would have been completely truthful and yet in no way revealing.

So how do you refute the fact that if a black man violated his gag order 
10 times, he'd be sitting in Rikers?

-- 
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC 
Bible  25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0