Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ###
Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 00:05:02 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <v2ha1u$ehmg$2@dont-email.me>
References: <v18e32$1vbql$1@dont-email.me> <v1di1h$3b2m5$1@dont-email.me>
 <v1dtdv$3dqg4$1@dont-email.me> <v1du2i$3dt7u$1@dont-email.me>
 <v1fetd$3s7jo$1@dont-email.me> <v1ft42$3vdau$2@dont-email.me>
 <-5Gdnf-nQvstC6b7nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
 <v1gid8$4ilc$1@dont-email.me> <v1h9eu$9faf$1@dont-email.me>
 <v1iqli$nsva$1@dont-email.me> <v1ln3c$vfh$1@news.muc.de>
 <v1s6e6$397iq$2@dont-email.me> <v1slmi$3cjtp$1@dont-email.me>
 <v1t8tt$3gu9t$3@dont-email.me> <v1vc8j$3jmr$1@dont-email.me>
 <v1vsru$7eqc$1@dont-email.me> <v21r4i$otc2$2@dont-email.me>
 <v22k4b$umr4$1@dont-email.me> <v24oah$1h4u3$1@dont-email.me>
 <v256fc$1kais$1@dont-email.me> <v27d05$25ga0$1@dont-email.me>
 <v2838r$29rd7$1@dont-email.me> <v2a8th$2ps09$1@dont-email.me>
 <v2ahqc$2qvr9$1@dont-email.me> <v2cb5s$39fvg$1@dont-email.me>
 <v2crk0$3cifp$1@dont-email.me> <v2cvuo$3dfkm$1@dont-email.me>
 <v2d0qm$3ddo5$3@dont-email.me> <v2f15t$3t14c$1@dont-email.me>
 <v2g2t6$3ugq$3@dont-email.me> <v2h95k$ecbj$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 07:05:03 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2f5f52f96f067406075e702eab09af4a";
	logging-data="476880"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19RmjKwq4u2mO884mLGDLpx"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:DSozbj0ZJRbGxMubAIr2sgK6UMI=
In-Reply-To: <v2h95k$ecbj$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3023

On 5/20/2024 11:49 PM, immibis wrote:
> On 20/05/24 19:56, olcott wrote:
>> For two or three years everyone has been claiming that the
>> above measures of correct simulation are incorrect. Their
>> "ultimate" measure of a "correct" simulation is that D does
>> whatever they expect D to do.
> 
> The ultimate measure of a correct simulation is that the simulation does 
> the same thing the thing that you are simulating does. In other words, 
> H(D,D) does the same thing that D(D) does.
> 
> When I test an electronic circuit in a circuit simulator and then build 
> it in real life, it should do the same thing that the simulator said it 
> would do.

*Lying meets the standard of losing defamation cases*
You are a liar to the extent of losing a defamation
case against you. The authorities can hunt you down
by your IP address.



-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer